Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Medical expenses reimbursed under health insurance cannot be deducted from motor accident compensation.

SRI NEERAJ SHARMAv.SMT. GEETHIKA SHARMA,

Medical expenses reimbursed under health insurance cannot be deducted from motor accident compensation.. SRI NEERAJ SHARMA vs SMT. GEETHIKA SHARMA,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Tribunal was justified in excluding medical expenses reimbursed under a health insurance policy from the compensation award

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part.

It also directed

The Court awarded the appellant an additional ₹25,760, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with the Tribunal within six weeks, and the appellant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation with interest

01Facts

The appellant, whose 19-year-old daughter died in a road traffic accident on 20 August 2023, appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the MACT, Bengaluru

p. 3 · p. 5

The Tribunal awarded ₹38,64,000, including ₹37,80,000 for loss of dependency, but did not award ₹25,760 in medical expenses because those expenses had been reimbursed under a health insurance policy

p. 4 · p. 5 · p. 6

The appellant also challenged the monthly income assessed for the deceased, relying on her studies and an asserted campus placement package; however, no document substantiating the placement or package was produced

p. 5

02Issues

i.Whether the Tribunal was justified in excluding medical expenses reimbursed under a health insurance policy from the compensation award

p. 6

ii.Whether the compensation assessed for loss of dependency and under the other heads required enhancement

p. 5 · p. 6

03Law Applied

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal

p. 2

Relying on New India Assurance Company Limited v. Dolly Satish Gandhi & Anr., 2026 INSC 498, the Court applied the principle that medical expenses reimbursed through a health insurance policy cannot, on that account, be deducted from the medical expenses claimed in a motor accident compensation proceeding

p. 6

In assessing dependency compensation, the Court accepted the Tribunal’s calculation based on the deceased’s assessed income, a 40% addition for future prospects, a 50% deduction for personal expenses, and multiplier 18

p. 5

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court found no basis to increase the deceased’s assessed monthly income: although the appellant relied on an alleged campus selection and annual package of ₹4,90,000, the only relevant document produced was a study certificate, and there was no documentary evidence of the selection or package

p. 5

It therefore upheld the Tribunal’s assessment of ₹25,000 per month and its calculation of loss of dependency, as well as the amounts awarded for consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses

p. 5 · p. 6

However, applying Dolly Satish Gandhi, the Court held that reimbursement by the deceased’s health insurer did not justify excluding the ₹25,760 in medical expenses from the award

p. 6

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

p. 7

The Court awarded the appellant an additional ₹25,760, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization

p. 7

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with the Tribunal within six weeks, and the appellant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation with interest

p. 7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI NEERAJ SHARMAvsSMT. GEETHIKA SHARMA,

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment