Madras High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawInsurance Law

Medical insurance benefits cannot be deducted from compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Venmathi vs Kajamohideen

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 09, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Medical insurance benefits cannot be deducted from compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.. Venmathi vs Kajamohideen. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sought compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained when a motorcycle struck her while she was walking on 17 September 2015.

Source reference: p.2–4

The Tribunal found the motorcycle rider negligent and awarded Rs.1,99,620, including Rs.49,513 for medical expenses—the amount the claimant said she had paid after receiving Rs.1,30,000 under a medical-insurance claim.

Source reference: p.2–4

The claimant appealed, seeking enhancement and contending that the medical-insurance payment should not reduce compensation for medical expenses.

Source reference: p.5–6, 7–8
02

Issues

1. Whether the Rs.1,30,000 received under the claimant’s medical-insurance policy could be deducted from compensation payable for medical expenses under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Source reference: p.6–8

2. Whether the Tribunal’s award under the various heads of compensation required enhancement.

Source reference: p.5–6, 7–9
03

Law Applied

Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for claims for compensation arising from motor-vehicle accidents, and Section 173 provides for an appeal against a Tribunal’s award.

Source reference: p.2

Applying New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Dolly Satish Gandhi & Another, 2026 INSC 498, the Court held that sums received under medical or Mediclaim insurance are not deductible from compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, including compensation for medical expenses. The Court noted that statutory compensation and contractual insurance benefits stand on different footing.

Source reference: p.6–8
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted that the claimant had received Rs.1,30,000 under medical insurance and applied Dolly Satish Gandhi to hold that this contractual benefit could not be deducted from her statutory compensation.

Source reference: p.7–8

It found the Tribunal’s other awards—including for disability, pain and suffering, transport, nourishment, attendant charges, future treatment and loss of earnings—proper and reasonable, and declined to alter them.

Source reference: p.8–9

It therefore revised the medical-expenses figure in its award table to Rs.1,30,000 and fixed total compensation at Rs.2,80,100.

Source reference: p.9
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed, with no order as to costs. The Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.2,80,100, carrying interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the claim petition until deposit.

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less any amount already deposited, within six weeks; the claimant may withdraw it on application to the Tribunal.

Source reference: p.9–10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

2 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19882

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

VenmathivsKajamohideen

Madras High Court · October 09, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment