CAT - ['Allahabad']

Medically Decategorized Railway Staff Must Be Absorbed in Regular Cadre Posts, Not Tenure or Safety Posts

Chandra Shekhar vs NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY

CAT - ['Allahabad']JUDGMENT: April 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The three applicants, formerly Loco Pilots (Mail/Goods) in the North Central Railway, were declared medically unfit (A-1 category) for running duties and subsequently de-categorized.

Source reference: p. 1-2

Following recommendations by a screening committee between 2019 and 2023, the applicants were absorbed into the ex-cadre/tenure posts of Crew Controller/Traction Loco Controller (CC/TLC).

Source reference: p. 2, para 3

The applicants challenged the impugned orders dated 24.09.2024, 22.04.2025, and 23.04.2025, contending that their absorption into tenure posts rather than a regular cadre violated statutory rules and would adversely affect their seniority and promotional prospects.

Source reference: p. 2-3
02

Issues

1. Whether the absorption of medically de-categorized staff into tenure/ex-cadre posts (CC/TLC) is legally sustainable under the Railway Board’s Master Circular No. 25.

Source reference: p. 2, para 2(a)

2. Whether the applicants are entitled to the same relief granted in similar precedents (e.g., Ram Babu Sharma v. UOI) regarding absorption in regular non-safety cadre posts.

Source reference: p. 2, para 2(b)
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Para 6.8 of Master Circular No. 25, which explicitly mandates that medically de-categorized staff must be absorbed into suitable alternative posts in a regular cadre only and not in tenure posts.

Source reference: p. 3, para 4

It relied on Chapter XIII of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual (IREM) Vol. 1 and Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (Act 1 of 1996), which safeguard the service benefits of disabled employees.

Source reference: p. 5, para 10

The court further cited RBE No. 9/1998 regarding the manning of Controller posts and recent High Court affirmations in Union of India v. Sayyed Aijaz Ali (Writ–A No. 8980/2023), which classified CC/TLC posts as "safety category" posts unsuitable for such de-categorized staff.

Source reference: p. 6-7, para 11
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the respondents’ action of posting the applicants as Crew Controllers violated Para 6.8 of Master Circular No. 25, which prohibits absorption into tenure posts to prevent loss of seniority and promotional avenues.

Source reference: p. 3, para 8

The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that the abolition of the Power/Crew Controller cadre (per RBE 9/1998) justified the posting, noting that since 2020, these posts have been re-classified under the "safety category".

Source reference: p. 7

By applying the principle of parity, the Tribunal noted that the applicants were "similarly situated" to those in Ram Babu Sharma and Sayyed Aijaz Ali, wherein the Allahabad High Court had already upheld that de-categorized staff must be moved to non-safety, regular cadre posts.

Source reference: p. 6-7

Consequently, the Tribunal held that if no regular post is vacant, the administration is legally bound to create a supernumerary post to protect the employees' status.

Source reference: p. 8, para 14
05

Holding

The Tribunal allowed the Original Application and quashed the impugned orders dated 24.09.2024, 22.04.2025, and 23.04.2025. It held that the applicants cannot be absorbed into tenure/safety posts like PC/TC/CC.

The respondents were directed to post the applicants in suitable alternative posts within a regular non-safety cadre or create supernumerary posts as per Chapter XIII of IREM Vol. 1 and Section 47 of Act 1 of 1996. The exercise must be completed within two months.

Source reference: p. 8, para 14
CAT - ['Allahabad']

Original Court PDF

Chandra ShekharvsNORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY

CAT - ['Allahabad'] · April 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment