01Facts
The petitioner sought to quash the Collector’s order dated 11 March 2022 and a show-cause notice dated 25 March 2022, together with the ensuing proceedings.
¶ 1It submitted that its grievance was covered by the High Court’s order dated 8 October 2026 in W.P.(C) No. 1640 of 2022 and connected petitions; the State did not oppose disposal on that basis.
¶ 2–3The Court accepted that the grievance and relief sought were identical.
¶ 502Issues
i.Whether the Collector’s order dated 11 March 2022 should be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after an opportunity of hearing, consistently with the order in the connected matter.
¶ 2, 5 · quoted order · ¶ 5–6ii.Whether the present petition should be disposed of in terms of the directions issued in that connected matter.
¶ 2–503Law Applied
The Court applied the procedural-fairness principle that a decision affecting parties should be made after giving them a due opportunity of hearing.
quoted order · ¶ 5–8The connected order also required the Collector, on remand, to consider the parties’ submissions and the record and issue a reasoned, speaking order in accordance with law.
quoted order · ¶ 5–804Reasoning
The Court found the petitioner’s grievance identical to that addressed in the connected petitions and adopted that order’s reasoning.
¶ 5In the connected matter, the Collector’s order had been made without affording the petitioners an opportunity of hearing; the Court therefore considered remand appropriate. It directed fresh consideration after hearing the petitioners and other concerned parties, without expressing any view on the merits.
¶ 5 · quoted order · ¶ 5–805Holding
The petition was disposed of in terms of the connected order. The Collector’s order dated 11 March 2022 was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the parties and passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.
¶ 5 · quoted order · ¶ 6–8The parties were directed to appear before the Collector on 9 December 2026. The Court expressed no opinion on the merits and made no order as to costs.
¶ 5 · quoted order · ¶ 8–9Original Court PDF
M/S GURU SHREE MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITEDvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
