Facts
On March 25, 2018, Ashish Masih was riding a motorcycle when he was struck by a dumper (CG-07-DH-4579) driven rashly and negligently by Respondent No. 1
Source reference: para. 4The deceased succumbed to his injuries on November 28, 2018
Source reference: para. 4The appellants (parents of the deceased) filed a claim under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Source reference: no citationThe Twelfth Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Raipur, awarded Rs. 12,90,319/- with 7% interest, assessing the deceased’s notional income at Rs. 7,800/- per month
Source reference: para. 3, 5The appellants challenged this award, seeking enhancement based on current minimum wage standards and proper consortium
Source reference: para. 5Issues
1. Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the notional income of the deceased at Rs. 7,800/- per month instead of the prevailing minimum wage
Source reference: para. 5, 82. Whether the claimants are entitled to a higher compensation for loss of consortium based on the number of dependents
Source reference: para. 5, 8Law Applied
The Court applied the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding just compensation.
Source reference: no citationIt relied on the minimum wage matrix applicable in the State of Chhattisgarh for unskilled laborers as of March 2018
Source reference: para. 8Furthermore, the Court applied the precedent set by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in *Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors. (2008) 18 SCC 130*, which establishes that parents are entitled to separate compensation for loss of consortium
Source reference: para. 8Reasoning
The High Court observed that since the claimants provided no documentary evidence of the deceased's monthly income, the Tribunal's assessment of Rs. 7,800/- was incorrect as it fell below the statutory minimum wage for an unskilled laborer in March 2018, which was Rs. 8,450/-
Source reference: para. 8Consequently, the Court re-calculated the annual income and added 40% for future prospects
Source reference: para. 10Regarding consortium, the Court found the Tribunal's award of Rs. 44,000/- insufficient.
Source reference: no citationFollowing the *Magma General* principle, the Court held that both parents (two claimants) are entitled to Rs. 40,000/- each, plus a 20% enhancement
Source reference: para. 8, 10Other heads, including medical bills, funeral expenses, and attendant charges, were found to be just and were maintained
Source reference: para. 9Holding
The Court allowed the appeal in part, answering both issues in the affirmative.
The total compensation was enhanced from Rs. 12,90,319/- to Rs. 14,35,139/-, resulting in an additional amount of Rs. 1,44,820/-
Source reference: para. 10, 11The Insurance Company (Respondent No. 3) was directed to pay the additional sum within 60 days, while all other terms of the original award remained intact
Source reference: para. 11, 12Original Court PDF
Smt. Asha Masih & Anr. v. Dinesh Kumar & Ors. [2026:CGHC:11340]
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in