Chhattisgarh High Court

Motor Accident Claims: Minimum Wage Notional Income Mandatory for Unskilled Labourers.

SMT. SANGEETA PRAJAPATI vs SURENDRA MANDAVI

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 13, 20263 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant, Smt. Sangeeta Prajapati, filed an appeal for enhancement of compensation against the judgment and award passed by the learned 3rd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rajnandgaon, in Claim Case No. 84/2022 dated 21.02.2023

Source reference: para. 1

On November 26, 2021, the claimant, a pillion rider, sustained injuries, including multiple fractures to her left leg, femur, and fibula bone of her right leg, and femur bone of her left leg, when an Innova car driven rashly and negligently by Respondent No. 1 dashed into the motorcycle she was on

Source reference: para. 2

The Tribunal awarded Rs. 7,51,651/- with 6% interest per annum

Source reference: para. 1

The claimant had sought Rs. 1,96,00,000/-

Source reference: para. 2

The medical documents indicated multiple fractures, a bone of the left leg divided into four parts, a cut injury below the heel of the left leg, and a fracture of the femur bone of the right leg

Source reference: para. 6

A permanent disability certificate (Ex. P/9) issued by the District Medical Board, Rajnandgaon, showed 48% permanent disability, with both knees partially stiff and proper calcification

Source reference: para. 6

Dr. Rajesh Sadani, a member of the medical board, proved the certificate, which was valid for one year and six months from August 27, 2020

Source reference: para. 6

The Tribunal assessed the functional disability at 25% and this finding was not challenged

Source reference: para. 7
02

Issues

1. Whether the learned Tribunal erred in assessing the notional income of the claimant at Rs. 9,000/- per month, when the minimum wage for an unskilled labourer in November 2021 was Rs. 9,280/-

Source reference: para. 3

2. Whether the learned Tribunal granted a meager amount for pain and suffering and failed to grant separate compensation for attendant charges

Source reference: para. 3, 9
03

Law Applied

The court applied the principles of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for assessing compensation in motor accident claims, specifically regarding the determination of notional income, future prospects, and compensation under conventional heads such as pain and suffering and attendant charges

Source reference: paras. 3

The court also considered the minimum wage rates applicable to unskilled laborers

Source reference: para. 3

The assessment of functional disability by the Medical Board, unchallenged by the respondents, was treated as final

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The court found that the Tribunal erred in assessing the claimant's notional income at Rs. 9,000/- per month, as the minimum wage for an unskilled labourer in November 2021 was Rs. 9,280/-, and this higher figure should have been used

Source reference: para. 8

The Tribunal had correctly added 25% for future prospects and applied a multiplier of 15 given the claimant's age, and these calculations were upheld

Source reference: para. 8

The court agreed that the compensation for pain and suffering at Rs. 15,000/- was meager given the multiple fractures and 48% permanent disability suffered by the claimant, necessitating reconsideration

Source reference: paras. 6, 9

Furthermore, the Tribunal failed to grant separate compensation for attendant charges, which the court deemed appropriate to grant

Source reference: para. 9

The compensation for medical expenses (Rs. 2,70,651/-), loss of earning during treatment (Rs. 36,000/-), and special diet (Rs. 15,000/-) were upheld as adequate and unchallenged

Source reference: para. 8
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part

The court enhanced the claimant's notional income from Rs. 9,000/- to Rs. 9,280/-, leading to a revised income calculation

Source reference: para. 10

The compensation for pain and suffering was enhanced from Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 50,000/-

Source reference: para. 10

Additionally, Rs. 10,000/- was granted for attendant charges

Source reference: para. 10

The total compensation awarded was enhanced from Rs. 7,51,651/- to Rs. 8,09,251/-

Source reference: para. 11

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the additional amount of Rs. 57,600/- with interest at 6% per annum within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order, but the appellants were not entitled to interest for the delay in filing the appeal

Source reference: para. 11

The rest of the conditions of the impugned award remained intact

Source reference: para. 11
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. SANGEETA PRAJAPATIvsSURENDRA MANDAVI

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment