Facts
The deceased sustained fatal crush injuries on February 15, 2010, when a bus driver negligently put the vehicle in motion while the deceased was boarding at a bus stop in RK Puram
Source reference: p. 1An FIR was registered, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) subsequently awarded compensation of Rs. 23,35,976/- with 7.5% interest via an award dated November 27, 2012
Source reference: p. 1The Appellants filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation, challenging the income assessment, the multiplier used, and the omission of future prospects and non-pecuniary heads
Source reference: p. 2Issues
1. Whether the income of the deceased should be calculated at Rs. 37,000/- instead of Rs. 33,750/- based on conflicting salary records
Source reference: p. 22. Whether the compensation must be realigned with established legal principles regarding multipliers, future prospects, and general damages
Source reference: p. 2, 3Law Applied
The Court applied the computation standards for motor accident claims established in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017), which mandates specific percentages for future prospects and standardized amounts for loss of consortium and funeral expenses
Source reference: p. 2It also applied the evidentiary rule that oral testimony in cross-examination (confirming a lower salary figure) may outweigh subsequent salary certificates
Source reference: p. 2followed United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur (2021), which directs that "loss of love and affection" is not a separate head of compensation when "loss of consortium" is granted
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
Regarding income, the Court upheld the Tribunal's assessment of Rs. 33,750/- per month, noting that the employer’s witness (PW2) admitted this figure during cross-examination as the total salary including benefits, and rejected a later salary certificate as inapplicable to the date of the accident
Source reference: p. 2Following Pranay Sethi, the Court adjusted the multiplier from 9 to 11 because the deceased was 55 years old
Source reference: p. 3It further added 10% for future prospects, which the Tribunal had omitted
Source reference: p. 3While deleting the Rs. 25,000/- previously awarded for "love and affection" per Satinder Kaur, the Court significantly increased "loss of consortium" to Rs. 1,20,000/- (Rs. 40,000 per dependent) and added Rs. 15,000/- for "loss of estate" to meet constitutional bench standards
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The Court allowed the appeal in part, enhancing the total compensation from Rs. 23,35,976/- to Rs. 32,23,367/-
The Court ordered a total enhancement of Rs. 8,87,391/- along with 7.5% interest per annum. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within six weeks, to be released to the claimants as a lumpsum payment in accordance with the Tribunal’s original apportionment
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
Geeta Harbola & Ors.vsInderjit Singh & Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in