Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawInsurance Law

Motor accident compensation interest reduced to 6% per annum; the compensation quantum is affirmed.

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs YOGESH K

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Motor accident compensation interest reduced to 6% per annum; the compensation quantum is affirmed.. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs YOGESH K. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 26 March 2019, a Canter lorry insured by the appellant struck the deceased Sharada K.’s moped. She died from her injuries on 31 March 2019.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the lorry driver negligent and awarded the claimants Rs.35,80,000 with interest at 9% per annum. The insurer appealed, challenging the assessment of the deceased’s income and the rate of interest; negligence and liability were not in dispute.

Source reference: pp. 2–4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s income and the resulting compensation required interference.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

2. Whether the Tribunal’s award of interest at 9% per annum should be reduced.

Source reference: pp. 3–4
03

Law Applied

Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, an aggrieved party may appeal a Claims Tribunal’s award.

Source reference: p. 2

For a self-employed person, the average income shown in ITRs for up to the preceding three years may be used as a reference; where only one or two ITRs are available, the court may also consider surrounding circumstances, including the nature and growth prospects of the business. ITRs are important prima facie evidence of income: Rashmirekha Tripathy v. The Branch Manager (Legal Claims), Sriram General Insurance Company Limited, 2026 INSC 661.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The Court also relied on the Division Bench decision in MFA No. 4659/2018 (24 August 2020) in reducing interest to 6% per annum.

Source reference: p. 8
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal based its income assessment on the deceased’s ITRs for Assessment Years 2017–18 and 2018–19, her work running a licensed beauty parlour, and a multiplier of 15. The High Court considered the Tribunal’s use of the more recent ITR—which disclosed the lower income—and its assessment of annual income at Rs.2,46,000 after tax to be reasonable and conservative under Rashmirekha Tripathy. It therefore left the compensation, including the awards under conventional heads and medical expenses, undisturbed.

Source reference: pp. 5–8

However, applying the cited Division Bench decision, it found 9% interest excessive and reduced the rate to 6% per annum.

Source reference: pp. 5–8
05

Holding

The appeal was disposed of, and the Tribunal’s award was modified only as to interest. The claimants remain entitled to Rs.35,80,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until deposit.

The insurer was directed to deposit the amount with accrued interest within eight weeks of receiving the judgment, if not already deposited; disbursement is to follow the Tribunal’s directions. No order was made as to costs.

Source reference: pp. 9–10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDvsYOGESH K

Karnataka High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment