Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Motor accident compensation must apply 2017 chart income and include earnings lost during the laid-up period.

RAVISHANKAR N R vs KEERTI KUMAR V

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Motor accident compensation must apply 2017 chart income and include earnings lost during the laid-up period.. RAVISHANKAR N R vs KEERTI KUMAR V. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 5 October 2017, the appellant, while riding a motorcycle, was involved in a collision with a tractor and sustained injuries resulting in a 10% disability to his right lower limb

Source reference: p.3

The Tribunal awarded compensation of ₹4,37,597 with interest at 6% per annum

Source reference: p.3

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, principally on the assessment of income, disability-related loss, and other heads of compensation

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal correctly assessed the claimant’s income and compensation for loss of future earning capacity.

Source reference: p.5

Whether compensation for laid-up-period income, loss of amenities, conveyance, food and nourishment, and future medical expenses required enhancement.

Source reference: p.5
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal

Source reference: p.2

In reassessing compensation, the Court applied the Karnataka notional-income chart for an accident occurring in 2017, adopting monthly income of ₹11,000

Source reference: p.5

It calculated future loss of earning capacity using the multiplier of 17 and the assessed 10% disability, and assessed three months’ income for the laid-up period

Source reference: p.5
04

Reasoning

The Court held that, given the 2017 accident, the Tribunal should have used the chart-based monthly income of ₹11,000 rather than ₹8,000.

Source reference: p.5

Applying the multiplier of 17 and 10% disability, it recalculated future loss of earning capacity at ₹2,24,400

Source reference: p.5

Because the Tribunal had not separately compensated the claimant for earnings lost during recovery, the Court allowed three months’ income, amounting to ₹33,000.

Source reference: p.6

It also increased compensation for conveyance, food and nourishment, future medical expenses, and loss of amenities by ₹20,000 under each head, while leaving the remaining heads unchanged

Source reference: p.6
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court enhanced the total award to ₹5,91,797, an increase of ₹1,54,200 over the Tribunal’s award

Source reference: p.7

The enhanced sum carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the appeal until realization, and the insurer was directed to deposit it within six weeks of receiving the certified judgment

Source reference: p.8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

RAVISHANKAR N RvsKEERTI KUMAR V

Karnataka High Court · September 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment