Madhya Pradesh High CourtBanking and Finance LawConstitutional Law

MP HC Unfreezes Bank Account, Keeps Disputed ₹10,800 In FD Pending Magistrate Order Within 3 Months

Task Evolution Through Propretor Ishwar Meenav.Indusind Bank Through Manager

MP HC Unfreezes Bank Account, Keeps Disputed ₹10,800 In FD Pending Magistrate Order Within 3 Months. Task Evolution Through Propretor Ishwar Meena vs Indusind Bank  Through Manager. Madhya Pradesh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner’s bank account should remain frozen when the disputed amount was ₹10,800.

The court held

The petition was disposed of with a direction to unfreeze the petitioner’s bank account and permit its operation.

It also directed

The disputed amount of ₹10,800 must be kept in a fixed deposit and may be liquidated only after an order by the competent Judicial Magistrate within three months.

If no such order is passed within that period, the petitioner may withdraw the fixed-deposit amount under intimation to the police agency.

The Bank may address any further complaint in accordance with law and the applicable SOP.

01Facts

The petitioner sought a direction to remove the hold or freeze on its IndusInd Bank account No. 257440846100.

¶ 1

Relying on Malcolm Murayis & Ors. v. State Bank of India & Ors. and the later order in Archana v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., the petitioner contended that the account should be operable while the disputed amount was separately secured.

¶ 2–4

The Court identified the disputed amount as ₹10,800 and considered the applicable Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for bank accounts placed on hold in cybercrime cases.

¶ 5–6

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner’s bank account should remain frozen when the disputed amount was ₹10,800.

¶ 5–6

ii.2. Whether the disputed amount should be secured separately while permitting the petitioner to operate the account, subject to further action under law.

¶ 6

03Law Applied

Under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court may grant appropriate relief where a bank-account freeze requires judicial intervention.

The Court applied the principles in Malcolm Murayis, which provided for disputed funds to be kept in fixed deposits pending action by the competent Magistrate, and the proportionality and grievance-redressal framework discussed in Archana, including the Ministry of Home Affairs SOP dated 10 April 2026.

¶ 3–5 · Archana · ¶ 11–18 reproduced in the judgment

The investigating agency is expected to proceed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the BNSS or other law relied upon; the disputed amount may be released if the competent Magistrate does not pass the relevant order within three months.

¶ 6

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 102

04Reasoning

The Court held that Malcolm Murayis and Archana applied mutatis mutandis to the petitioner’s case.

¶ 5

It therefore distinguished the limited disputed sum of ₹10,800 from the rest of the account: the disputed amount was to be preserved in a fixed deposit, while the account itself was to be unfrozen.

¶ 6

This arrangement protected the disputed funds while allowing the petitioner to operate the account, consistently with the principles and SOP considered by the Court.

¶ 6

05Holding

The petition was disposed of with a direction to unfreeze the petitioner’s bank account and permit its operation.

¶ 6

The disputed amount of ₹10,800 must be kept in a fixed deposit and may be liquidated only after an order by the competent Judicial Magistrate within three months.

¶ 6

If no such order is passed within that period, the petitioner may withdraw the fixed-deposit amount under intimation to the police agency.

¶ 6

The Bank may address any further complaint in accordance with law and the applicable SOP.

¶ 6
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

Task Evolution Through Propretor Ishwar MeenavsIndusind Bank Through Manager

Madhya Pradesh High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment