Delhi High Court

Multiplier must be based on the age of the deceased, not the claimant.

Raj Rani & Ors vs Harish Chand & Ors

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: May 21, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The Appellants challenged the award dated 19th March 2014 passed by the MACT, Shahdara, which granted compensation of Rs. 11,43,000/- with 9% interest following a motor accident.

Source reference: para. 1

The deceased was 18 years old at the time of the accident and was employed as a ‘Field Executive’.

Source reference: para. 2

The Tribunal had originally applied a multiplier of 14 (based on the age of the claimant/parent) and granted 50% future prospects.

Source reference: para. 2

The Appellants sought re-alignment of these figures in accordance with settled supreme court precedents.

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the multiplier should be determined based on the age of the deceased or the age of the claimants.

Source reference: para. 2(i)

2. Whether the percentage for future prospects and non-pecuniary heads (loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium) required adjustment per current legal standards.

Source reference: para. 2(ii)-(iii)
03

Law Applied

National Insurance Company v. Pranay Sethi Ors. (2017) 16 SCC 680, which mandates that the multiplier must be based on the age of the deceased and sets standardized percentages for future prospects and fixed sums for conventional heads.

Source reference: para. 2

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur (2021) 11 SCC 780, which clarified that compensation for 'loss of love and affection' is not a permissible head, while 'loss of consortium' must be awarded to each qualifying family member.

Source reference: para. 2(iii)
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal erred by using a multiplier of 14; since the deceased was 18 years old, the correct multiplier under Pranay Sethi is 18.

Source reference: para. 2(i)

Regarding future prospects, the Court reduced the Tribunal's 50% grant to 40% to align with the deceased’s employment status.

Source reference: para. 2(ii)

In re-calculating non-pecuniary damages, the Court deleted the Rs. 1,00,000/- awarded for 'love and affection' as per Satinder Kaur, but increased 'loss of consortium' to Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. 40,000 for each of the five claimants).

Source reference: para. 2(iii), 3

The 'loss of estate' was adjusted to Rs. 15,000/- and 'funeral expenses' were reduced to Rs. 15,000/- to match statutory standards.

Source reference: para. 3
05

Holding

The Court allowed the appeal and enhanced the compensation from Rs. 11,43,000/- to Rs. 14,39,600/-, resulting in an enhancement of Rs. 2,96,600/-.

The Court directed the Insurance Company to deposit the enhanced amount with 9% interest per annum from the date of the petition before the MACT within six weeks. The amount is to be released to the Appellants in the proportions previously determined by the Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 5
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Raj Rani & OrsvsHarish Chand & Ors

Delhi High Court · May 21, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment