Facts
The appellant (Insurance Company) challenged the award dated 13.02.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jashpur, which fastened liability upon it to pay compensation to the claimants (the widow, minor son, and mother of the deceased Shailendra Lakda)
Source reference: para. 1The Insurance Company contended that the deceased was himself negligent in driving
Source reference: para. 2Conversely, the claimants filed a cross-objection seeking an enhancement of the award, arguing that the deceased’s income was undervalued and that an incorrect multiplier of 16 was applied given the deceased was 28 years old
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the Insurance Company could be absolved of liability on the grounds of the deceased’s alleged negligence
Source reference: para. 22. Whether the income of the deceased was correctly assessed by the Tribunal at Rs. 12,000/- per month
Source reference: para. 63. Whether the appropriate multiplier for a deceased aged 28 years is 16 or 17
Source reference: para. 7Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding appeals against claim awards
Source reference: para. 1It further relied on established actuarial principles for motor accident compensation, specifically the application of the multiplier system based on the age of the deceased, the addition of 40% for future prospects, and a 1/3 deduction for personal expenses where the deceased has three dependents
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The High Court dismissed the Insurance Company's appeal, finding no merit in the argument regarding the deceased's negligence based on the evidence available on record
Source reference: para. 5Regarding the claimants' cross-objection, the Court upheld the monthly income of Rs. 12,000/-, noting that the deceased's wife had herself pleaded and testified to this amount
Source reference: para. 6However, the Court found a legal error in the Tribunal’s choice of multiplier; for a person aged 28, a multiplier of 17 is legally mandatory, whereas the Tribunal had applied 16
Source reference: para. 7Consequently, the Court re-computed the "Loss of Income" by applying the 17 multiplier to the annual dependency of Rs. 1,34,400/- (after adding 40% future prospects and deducting 1/3 personal expenses), resulting in an enhanced sum
Source reference: para. 7-8Holding
The Court dismissed the Insurance Company's appeal and partly allowed the claimants' cross-objection
It enhanced the total compensation from Rs. 23,00,400/- to Rs. 24,34,800/-
Source reference: para. 8The Court directed the Insurance Company to deposit the additional amount of Rs. 1,34,400/- with 6% interest per annum from the date of the claim application until realization
Source reference: para. 8All other conditions of the original award remained intact
Source reference: para. 8Original Court PDF
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDvsSMT. ARTI LAKDA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in