CAT - Allahabad

Murder by anti-social elements during performance of duty entitles dependents to ex-gratia compensation.

PRIYANKA GAUR vs NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY

CAT - AllahabadJUDGMENT: March 17, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant’s husband, Late Dheeraj, was a Welder Mechanical ‘C’ in the North Central Railway, Agra Fort Division

Source reference: p. 2

On the night of 20/21.03.2020, while performing official duty at Agra Fort Railway Station, he was attacked and killed by an unknown person

Source reference: p. 2

Police investigation revealed the murderer was a Bangladeshi national, Sajan, who committed the crime for the purpose of robbery

Source reference: p. 2, 4

The applicant, as the widow, sought ex-gratia death claim benefits, which were rejected by the respondents via an order dated 22.02.2023

Source reference: p. 2

The respondents contended that because the murder was for "theft/loot," it did not fall under the purview of eligibility for ex-gratia compensation as per Railway Board guidelines

Source reference: p. 2-3
02

Issues

Whether the death of a railway employee, caused by an act of violence by a third party for the purpose of robbery while on duty, qualifies for ex-gratia compensation under the relevant Railway Board guidelines

Source reference: p. 3-4
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal primarily applied the guidelines set forth in the Railway Board Letter No. RBE 285/1999 dated 05.11.1999

Source reference: p. 3

Para 5(b) of the said letter provides for ex-gratia compensation in cases of "death occurring in the course of performance of duties attributable to acts of violence by terrorists, anti-social elements, etc."

Source reference: p. 3

The rule elaborates that acts of violence or assault by "smugglers, dacoits, anti-social elements, etc." are covered under this heading

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal examined the facts alongside the provisions of RBE 285/1999. It was undisputed that the deceased was on official duty at the time of the incident

Source reference: p. 2, 4

The respondents' primary defense was that a murder for robbery did not meet the criteria for compensation

Source reference: p. 2

The Tribunal observed that the police investigation identified the assailant as a Bangladeshi national who murdered the employee with the intent to rob him

Source reference: p. 4

The Tribunal reasoned that such an individual undeniably qualifies as an "anti-social element" as contemplated under Para 5(b) of the RBE guidelines

Source reference: p. 4

Consequently, the death was directly attributable to an act of violence by an anti-social element during the performance of official duties, bringing the case squarely within the eligibility criteria for ex-gratia compensation

Source reference: p. 4
05

Holding

The Tribunal allowed the Original Application and quashed the impugned order dated 22.02.2023

It held that the applicant is entitled to the death claim benefits as the murder by an anti-social element on duty is covered under RBE No. 285/1999

Source reference: p. 4

The respondents were directed to pay the applicable ex-gratia compensation to the applicant

Source reference: p. 4

No costs were awarded

Source reference: p. 4
CAT - Allahabad

Original Court PDF

PRIYANKA GAURvsNORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY

CAT - Allahabad · March 17, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment