Facts
The applicant’s husband, Late Dheeraj, was a Welder Mechanical ‘C’ in the North Central Railway, Agra Fort Division
Source reference: p. 2On the night of 20/21.03.2020, while performing official duty at Agra Fort Railway Station, he was attacked and killed by an unknown person
Source reference: p. 2Police investigation revealed the murderer was a Bangladeshi national, Sajan, who committed the crime for the purpose of robbery
Source reference: p. 2, 4The applicant, as the widow, sought ex-gratia death claim benefits, which were rejected by the respondents via an order dated 22.02.2023
Source reference: p. 2The respondents contended that because the murder was for "theft/loot," it did not fall under the purview of eligibility for ex-gratia compensation as per Railway Board guidelines
Source reference: p. 2-3Issues
Whether the death of a railway employee, caused by an act of violence by a third party for the purpose of robbery while on duty, qualifies for ex-gratia compensation under the relevant Railway Board guidelines
Source reference: p. 3-4Law Applied
The Tribunal primarily applied the guidelines set forth in the Railway Board Letter No. RBE 285/1999 dated 05.11.1999
Source reference: p. 3Para 5(b) of the said letter provides for ex-gratia compensation in cases of "death occurring in the course of performance of duties attributable to acts of violence by terrorists, anti-social elements, etc."
Source reference: p. 3The rule elaborates that acts of violence or assault by "smugglers, dacoits, anti-social elements, etc." are covered under this heading
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The Tribunal examined the facts alongside the provisions of RBE 285/1999. It was undisputed that the deceased was on official duty at the time of the incident
Source reference: p. 2, 4The respondents' primary defense was that a murder for robbery did not meet the criteria for compensation
Source reference: p. 2The Tribunal observed that the police investigation identified the assailant as a Bangladeshi national who murdered the employee with the intent to rob him
Source reference: p. 4The Tribunal reasoned that such an individual undeniably qualifies as an "anti-social element" as contemplated under Para 5(b) of the RBE guidelines
Source reference: p. 4Consequently, the death was directly attributable to an act of violence by an anti-social element during the performance of official duties, bringing the case squarely within the eligibility criteria for ex-gratia compensation
Source reference: p. 4Holding
The Tribunal allowed the Original Application and quashed the impugned order dated 22.02.2023
It held that the applicant is entitled to the death claim benefits as the murder by an anti-social element on duty is covered under RBE No. 285/1999
Source reference: p. 4The respondents were directed to pay the applicable ex-gratia compensation to the applicant
Source reference: p. 4No costs were awarded
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
PRIYANKA GAURvsNORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in