Chhattisgarh High Court
Administrative and Public LawBanking and Finance Law

No further police-protection directions are warranted once bank operations resume.

I D B I BANK LIMITED vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
No further police-protection directions are warranted once bank operations resume.. I D B I BANK LIMITED vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Two alleged fraudulent withdrawals from customer accounts led to criminal cases against two persons working through an outsourcing agency.

Source reference: para. 2–5

While the investigation was pending, beneficiaries and supporters allegedly obstructed the Charoda Branch and prevented its operation.

Source reference: para. 2–5

The Bank sought police protection and action on its complaints under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Source reference: para. 2–5

By an earlier order, the Court directed the authorities to explain their response and take steps to resume the Branch’s operations; the police subsequently reported that the Branch had reopened and banking had resumed.

Source reference: para. 2–5
02

Issues

1. Whether further directions were required to secure the Branch’s operation and protect the Bank’s staff and customers from alleged obstruction.

Source reference: para. 1–4

2. Whether the Court should direct further police action on the Bank’s complaints after the Branch had reopened and banking operations had resumed.

Source reference: para. 5–6
03

Law Applied

The petition invoked the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to seek public-law relief.

Source reference: para. 1, 3

The Bank also relied on Section 36AD of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, concerning obstruction of banking business, and referred to applicable penal provisions.

Source reference: para. 1, 3

These provisions and contentions were not substantively interpreted or adjudicated: the Court disposed of the petition on the basis that its earlier directions had been complied with and operations had resumed.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that the police authorities had filed affidavits reporting that the Branch reopened on 28 September 2026 and regular banking operations resumed.

Source reference: para. 5

In light of that development and the compliance with the Court’s order of 24 September 2026, it considered further relief unnecessary.

Source reference: para. 6

The Court did not determine the allegations of obstruction or decide the Bank’s statutory and penal-law contentions on their merits.

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court held that no further order was required and disposed of the petition.

It directed that the relevant process be carried out in accordance with law and left it open to any person with a surviving grievance to approach the appropriate forum.

Source reference: para. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Banking Regulation Act, 19491

Section 36AD
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

I D B I BANK LIMITEDvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment