Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawInsurance Law

Non-dependent adult children’s claims require a 50% deduction for the deceased’s personal expenses.

THE REGIONAL MANAGER vs BHASKAR

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 09, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Non-dependent adult children’s claims require a 50% deduction for the deceased’s personal expenses.. THE REGIONAL MANAGER vs BHASKAR. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Bhaskar and Shanthla claimed compensation for the death of their father, Thimmachar, in a motorcycle accident on 1 December 2023.

Source reference: p. 2–4

The MACT awarded ₹10,76,000, including ₹9,60,000 for loss of dependency, with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: p. 2–4

The insurer appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, challenging the quantum, principally on the ground that the Tribunal had made no deduction for the deceased’s personal expenses although the claimants were his major son and married daughter.

Source reference: p. 2–4

The High Court considered the deceased’s age, the appropriate notional income, the personal-expense deduction, and consortium.

Source reference: p. 5–6
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal erred in calculating loss of dependency by making no deduction for the deceased’s personal expenses, given that the claimants were his major son and married daughter.

Source reference: p. 4

2. Whether the compensation awarded under the relevant heads, including consortium, required adjustment.

Source reference: p. 4–6
03

Law Applied

Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the insurer may appeal against an award of the MACT.

Source reference: p. 2

In calculating loss of dependency, the Court applied a 50% deduction for the deceased’s personal expenses, used the multiplier of 5 having regard to the deceased’s age of 80, and adopted a notional monthly income of ₹16,250 for 2023.

Source reference: p. 5

For consortium, it applied the principle in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, awarding ₹40,000 per claimant with a 20% escalation.

Source reference: p. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court held that the deceased was 80 at the time of the accident and affirmed the Tribunal’s use of multiplier 5.

Source reference: p. 5

It substituted the 2023 notional income of ₹16,250 for the ₹16,000 used by the Tribunal, but deducted 50% for personal expenses because the Tribunal had made no deduction and the claimants were the deceased’s major son and married daughter.

Source reference: p. 5

This resulted in loss of dependency of ₹4,87,500 (₹16,250 less 50%, multiplied by 12 and by 5).

Source reference: p. 5

Applying Pranay Sethi, the Court increased consortium to ₹48,000 for each claimant, or ₹96,000 in total, and left the awards for loss of estate and funeral expenses unchanged.

Source reference: p. 6
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The total compensation was reduced from ₹10,76,000 to ₹6,19,500, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

Source reference: p. 6–8

The claimants were allotted equal shares; the Tribunal’s deposit and release order was otherwise left unaltered, and the deposited amount was directed to be transmitted to the Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 6–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

THE REGIONAL MANAGERvsBHASKAR

Karnataka High Court · October 09, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment