Facts
The three applicants are Superintendents serving under the Central Bureau of Narcotics, Ministry of Finance
Source reference: p. 1They challenged an impugned communication dated 27.01.2024 which rejected their representation for the grant of a non-functional Grade Pay (GP) of Rs. 5,400/- in Pay Band-2 (PB-2)
Source reference: p. 2The respondents denied the benefit on the grounds that the applicants were holding substantive posts with a Grade Pay of Rs. 4,600/- and had only reached the Rs. 4,800/- scale through financial upgradation under the MACP/ACP scheme, rather than through regular promotion to a post carrying that scale substantively
Source reference: p. 3The applicants contended that they were entitled to the higher GP after completing four years of regular service in the GP of Rs. 4,800/-, regardless of how that scale was attained
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether Group-B officers who have attained the Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- via financial upgradation (ACP/MACP) are entitled to the non-functional Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- upon completion of four years of service in the former scale.
Source reference: p. 3 / para. 4-6Law Applied
The benefit of non-functional Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- should be extended to Group-B officers after four years of service in GP Rs. 4,800/-, irrespective of whether that scale was granted substantively or through financial upgradation
Source reference: p. 3-4Legal principle established by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in M. Subramaniam v. Union of India & Others (W.P. No. 13225/2010), affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and subsequently followed by various benches of the Central Administrative Tribunal, including the Jabalpur Bench in O.A. No. 200/758/2022
Source reference: p. 4Reasoning
The Court examined the respondents' objection that only officers in posts with a "substantive" Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- (like Income Tax Officers or Superintendents in Customs) qualify for the non-functional upgrade
Source reference: p. 3The Tribunal observed that the issue is no longer res integra (a settled point of law)
Source reference: p. 3By applying the ratio of M. Subramaniam, the Tribunal reasoned that the distinction between obtaining a grade pay through promotion versus through financial upgradation is irrelevant for the purpose of granting the non-functional GP of Rs. 5,400/- after four years
Source reference: p. 4Since the applicants had completed four years in the GP of Rs. 4,800/-, they were found to be "similarly situated" to the successful litigants in earlier cited cases
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Tribunal allowed the Original Application and set aside the impugned communication.
the applicants are entitled to the Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- on a non-functional basis effective from the date they completed four years of regular service in the Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/-
Source reference: p. 4The respondents were directed to grant the benefit along with all consequential arrears within 90 days of receipt of the order. No costs were awarded
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
Mahendra Kumar JainvsCENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in