Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Notional income for an injured engineering student was enhanced to ₹11,000 monthly for future-loss calculations.

SAHANA Mv.ASHA B L

Notional income for an injured engineering student was enhanced to ₹11,000 monthly for future-loss calculations.. SAHANA M vs ASHA B L. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the appellant’s loss of future income required enhancement

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part.

It also directed

The Court enhanced the total compensation from ₹3,51,210 to ₹4,41,130 and awarded the appellant an additional ₹89,920, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the appeal until realisation

Respondents 1 and 2 were held jointly and severally liable, and the Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation within six weeks of receiving the certified copy of the judgment

01Facts

On 30 September 2017, the appellant, then an 18-year-old engineering student, was injured when a Tata Indica Vista collided with the motorcycle on which she was travelling with her father

pp. 3–5

She received inpatient treatment for 15 days

p. 4

The Tribunal awarded her ₹3,51,210, with interest at 6% per annum

p. 3

She appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, contending that the compensation—particularly for future income, pain and suffering, and medical expenses—was inadequate

pp. 2, 4–5

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the appellant’s loss of future income required enhancement

pp. 5–6

ii.2. Whether the compensation awarded under pain and suffering and other heads required modification

pp. 4–6

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

p. 2

In reassessing compensation, the Court applied a calculation based on monthly income, 12 months, a multiplier of 18, and 11% disability for loss of future income; it also considered whether the award under pain and suffering warranted an increase

p. 6

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal had assessed the appellant’s notional monthly income at ₹6,000, but that it ought to have been ₹11,000

p. 5

Applying the multiplier of 18 and 11% disability, it calculated loss of future income at ₹2,61,360

p. 6

It also increased compensation for pain and suffering by ₹10,000, from ₹30,000 to ₹40,000, while leaving the amounts for medical expenses, nourishment and miscellaneous expenses, and loss of amenities unchanged

p. 6

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

p. 7

The Court enhanced the total compensation from ₹3,51,210 to ₹4,41,130 and awarded the appellant an additional ₹89,920, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the appeal until realisation

p. 7

Respondents 1 and 2 were held jointly and severally liable, and the Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation within six weeks of receiving the certified copy of the judgment

pp. 7–8
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SAHANA MvsASHA B L

Karnataka High Court · September 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment