NTA cannot withhold JEE results for verification of a UDID card issued by the Government of India.

The Petitioner, a person with 55% Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), registered for the JEE-Mains Session 1 as a 'General' candidate because she lacked a disability certificate at that time.

Upon obtaining her certificate and Unique Disability ID (UDID), she sought to update her status to 'Persons with Disabilities' (PwD) for Session 2.

Despite directions from the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) to verify her documents, and the subsequent issuance of an Admit Card acknowledging her 55% ASD status, the National Testing Agency (NTA) withheld her result on April 20, 2026, with the remark "Result Later".

The NTA contended that the Petitioner’s UDID carried a "T" (Temporary) mark, requiring further committee review.

The Petitioner filed this writ seeking declaration of her result to enable registration for the JEE-Advanced Examination before the May 2, 2026 deadline.

1. Whether the Respondent can legally withhold the Petitioner’s examination result solely on the grounds of ongoing document verification and the temporary nature of the disability certificate.

2. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to the declaration of her result to prevent irreparable loss regarding further academic opportunities.

Clause 4.2.4(5) [stipulates] that reservation benefits are subject to document verification, and any candidate found using false or incorrect information shall be excluded from admission or have their admission cancelled.

Clause 5.5.3 provides that results may be cancelled for candidates indulging in "Unfair Means Practices".

Recognition of the legal standing of the UDID card issued by the Government of India.

The Court found the Respondent’s justification for withholding the results unsustainable. It reasoned that the NTA had already issued the Admit Card after receiving the UDID and conducted a committee meeting to interview the Petitioner; thus, basic verification was complete.

The Court noted that the "temporary" nature of the UDID (due to ASD being potentially curable) did not invalidate the document.

Critically, the Court held that the NTA’s interests are protected by Clauses 4.2.4(5) and 5.5.3, which allow for the ex post facto cancellation of results or admissions if fraud is discovered later.

Conversely, withholding the result at this stage would cause the Petitioner irreparable injury by barring her from the JEE-Advanced registration, even if her documents were ultimately found genuine.

The Court granted the NTA liberty to take action under the Information Bulletin if discrepancies or unfair means are discovered later, while reserving the Petitioner's right to challenge any such future action.

No order as to costs was made.