Facts
Forty-nine street vendors operating within the Delhi Cantonment Board area filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Source reference: p.1The Petitioners sought protection against dispossession and harassment by authorities
Source reference: para 3On August 7, 2025, the Court recorded the Delhi Cantonment Board's resolution not to remove the Petitioners pending further orders
Source reference: para 4Subsequently, the Town Vending Committee (TVC) finalized a survey and issued provisional Certificates of Vending to the Petitioners
Source reference: para 7The Petitioners thereafter raised a secondary grievance regarding harassment and obstruction by unauthorized street vendors
Source reference: para 9Issues
1. Whether the Petitioners, as identified and surveyed vendors, are entitled to peaceful vending at their designated sites
Source reference: p.2, para 82. Whether the Delhi Cantonment Board and Police are obligated to take enforcement action against unauthorized vendors to ensure the rights of authorized vendors are protected
Source reference: p.3, para 11-12Law Applied
The Court applied the statutory framework governing street vending, specifically the functions of the Town Vending Committee (TVC).
Source reference: no citationTVC’s internal resolutions dated January 15, 2026, which established a three-challan eligibility criteria for survey inclusion
Source reference: para 6resolution dated November 3, 2025, which mandated that identified vendors be allowed to vend according to their certificates while empowering police and revenue authorities to remove unauthorized vendors
Source reference: para 10The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to enforce these administrative decisions
Source reference: p.1Reasoning
The Court observed that the statutory survey process for the Delhi Cantonment Board had been completed and the Petitioners were formally recognized through provisional Certificates of Vending
Source reference: para 7By linking the Petitioners’ status to the TVC resolution of November 3, 2025, the Court determined that the Petitioners possess a protected right to vend in their respective areas
Source reference: para 10The Court reasoned that for this right to be meaningful, the authorities must proactively prevent interference by those not identified in the official surveys of July 26, 2024, and August 23, 2024
Source reference: para 10-11Consequently, the Court found that the Delhi Cantonment Board and the Delhi Police maintain a concurrent duty to cooperate in removing unauthorized elements to maintain the integrity of the vending plan
Source reference: para 11-12Holding
The Court held that the Petitioners shall be allowed to peacefully vend from their respective sites
It directed the Delhi Cantonment Board, in cooperation with the Delhi Police, to take strict action against unauthorized street vendors in accordance with the TVC’s minutes of the meeting dated November 3, 2025
Source reference: para 11The authorities must ensure that unauthorized vendors do not operate in the designated areas and that authorized vendors are not disturbed
Source reference: para 12The petition was disposed of with these directions, and the subsequent hearing date was cancelled
Source reference: para 13-14Original Court PDF
Ravi Kumar And OrsvsCommissioner Of Police And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in