Delhi High Court

Only authorized street vendors identified in the survey may vend; unauthorized vendors are subject to removal.

Ravi Kumar And Ors vs Commissioner Of Police And Ors

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: May 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Forty-nine street vendors operating within the Delhi Cantonment Board area filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Source reference: p.1

The Petitioners sought protection against dispossession and harassment by authorities

Source reference: para 3

On August 7, 2025, the Court recorded the Delhi Cantonment Board's resolution not to remove the Petitioners pending further orders

Source reference: para 4

Subsequently, the Town Vending Committee (TVC) finalized a survey and issued provisional Certificates of Vending to the Petitioners

Source reference: para 7

The Petitioners thereafter raised a secondary grievance regarding harassment and obstruction by unauthorized street vendors

Source reference: para 9
02

Issues

1. Whether the Petitioners, as identified and surveyed vendors, are entitled to peaceful vending at their designated sites

Source reference: p.2, para 8

2. Whether the Delhi Cantonment Board and Police are obligated to take enforcement action against unauthorized vendors to ensure the rights of authorized vendors are protected

Source reference: p.3, para 11-12
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the statutory framework governing street vending, specifically the functions of the Town Vending Committee (TVC).

Source reference: no citation

TVC’s internal resolutions dated January 15, 2026, which established a three-challan eligibility criteria for survey inclusion

Source reference: para 6

resolution dated November 3, 2025, which mandated that identified vendors be allowed to vend according to their certificates while empowering police and revenue authorities to remove unauthorized vendors

Source reference: para 10

The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to enforce these administrative decisions

Source reference: p.1
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the statutory survey process for the Delhi Cantonment Board had been completed and the Petitioners were formally recognized through provisional Certificates of Vending

Source reference: para 7

By linking the Petitioners’ status to the TVC resolution of November 3, 2025, the Court determined that the Petitioners possess a protected right to vend in their respective areas

Source reference: para 10

The Court reasoned that for this right to be meaningful, the authorities must proactively prevent interference by those not identified in the official surveys of July 26, 2024, and August 23, 2024

Source reference: para 10-11

Consequently, the Court found that the Delhi Cantonment Board and the Delhi Police maintain a concurrent duty to cooperate in removing unauthorized elements to maintain the integrity of the vending plan

Source reference: para 11-12
05

Holding

The Court held that the Petitioners shall be allowed to peacefully vend from their respective sites

It directed the Delhi Cantonment Board, in cooperation with the Delhi Police, to take strict action against unauthorized street vendors in accordance with the TVC’s minutes of the meeting dated November 3, 2025

Source reference: para 11

The authorities must ensure that unauthorized vendors do not operate in the designated areas and that authorized vendors are not disturbed

Source reference: para 12

The petition was disposed of with these directions, and the subsequent hearing date was cancelled

Source reference: para 13-14
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Ravi Kumar And OrsvsCommissioner Of Police And Ors

Delhi High Court · May 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment