Facts
The petitioner, Jeba, sought 21 days’ ordinary leave for her father, convict prisoner Kanagaraj, so he could assist with redeeming pledged jewellery in connection with her arranged marriage.
Source reference: pp. 2–3The authorities granted leave by order dated 17 September 2026, but required him to be accompanied by a police escort. The petitioner challenged that condition, stating that she could not provide food and accommodation for the escort.
Source reference: pp. 2–3The prisoner undertook not to contact the victim or her family and not to enter the jurisdiction of Ambilikai Police Station, where the victim resided.
Source reference: pp. 2–3The State submitted that the escort condition had been imposed because the victim lived nearby.
Source reference: p. 3Issues
Whether the condition requiring the prisoner to take ordinary leave with a police escort should be set aside and leave granted without escort.
Source reference: pp. 2–3, 5Whether safeguards should be imposed during the leave period, including restrictions on contact with the victim and reporting requirements.
Source reference: pp. 3, 5Law Applied
The Court cited no specific statute or general legal test governing ordinary leave. It relied on the circumstances of the case and the prisoner’s undertaking in deciding whether leave could be granted without escort.
Source reference: p. 5It also directed that the prisoner comply with the conditions prescribed in the Jail Manual.
Source reference: p. 5The Court recorded the State’s submission that, following directions in M. Mariaselvam v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, W.P. (MD) No. 27789 of 2023, dated 20 December 2023, prison authorities were not insisting on stringent surety conditions.
Source reference: p. 4Reasoning
The Court considered the stated need for the prisoner’s presence in connection with his daughter’s arranged marriage and her need to redeem pledged jewellery. It also considered his undertaking not to contact the victim or her family and not to enter the area where the victim resided.
Source reference: pp. 3, 5In light of those circumstances, the Court found that leave without escort was appropriate, while imposing daily reporting, a return-to-prison requirement, compliance with Jail Manual conditions, and restrictions protecting the victim.
Source reference: pp. 3, 5Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant Kanagaraj 21 days’ ordinary leave without escort.
During leave, he must report daily to the fourth respondent at 6:30 p.m., return to the second respondent on expiry of leave, comply with the Jail Manual, use the leave only for its stated purpose, avoid contact with the victim or her family, and not enter the jurisdiction of Ambilikai Police Station.
Source reference: p. 5The petitioner must submit the necessary documents and a copy of the order to the prison authorities.
Source reference: p. 5No costs were awarded.
Source reference: p. 5Original Court PDF
JebavsThe Deputy Inspector General
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
