Madras High Court
Criminal LawAdministrative and Public Law

Ordinary leave may be granted without police escort subject to conditions protecting the victim.

Jeba vs The Deputy Inspector General

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Ordinary leave may be granted without police escort subject to conditions protecting the victim.. Jeba vs The Deputy Inspector General. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, Jeba, sought 21 days’ ordinary leave for her father, convict prisoner Kanagaraj, so he could assist with redeeming pledged jewellery in connection with her arranged marriage.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

The authorities granted leave by order dated 17 September 2026, but required him to be accompanied by a police escort. The petitioner challenged that condition, stating that she could not provide food and accommodation for the escort.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

The prisoner undertook not to contact the victim or her family and not to enter the jurisdiction of Ambilikai Police Station, where the victim resided.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

The State submitted that the escort condition had been imposed because the victim lived nearby.

Source reference: p. 3
02

Issues

Whether the condition requiring the prisoner to take ordinary leave with a police escort should be set aside and leave granted without escort.

Source reference: pp. 2–3, 5

Whether safeguards should be imposed during the leave period, including restrictions on contact with the victim and reporting requirements.

Source reference: pp. 3, 5
03

Law Applied

The Court cited no specific statute or general legal test governing ordinary leave. It relied on the circumstances of the case and the prisoner’s undertaking in deciding whether leave could be granted without escort.

Source reference: p. 5

It also directed that the prisoner comply with the conditions prescribed in the Jail Manual.

Source reference: p. 5

The Court recorded the State’s submission that, following directions in M. Mariaselvam v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, W.P. (MD) No. 27789 of 2023, dated 20 December 2023, prison authorities were not insisting on stringent surety conditions.

Source reference: p. 4
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the stated need for the prisoner’s presence in connection with his daughter’s arranged marriage and her need to redeem pledged jewellery. It also considered his undertaking not to contact the victim or her family and not to enter the area where the victim resided.

Source reference: pp. 3, 5

In light of those circumstances, the Court found that leave without escort was appropriate, while imposing daily reporting, a return-to-prison requirement, compliance with Jail Manual conditions, and restrictions protecting the victim.

Source reference: pp. 3, 5
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant Kanagaraj 21 days’ ordinary leave without escort.

During leave, he must report daily to the fourth respondent at 6:30 p.m., return to the second respondent on expiry of leave, comply with the Jail Manual, use the leave only for its stated purpose, avoid contact with the victim or her family, and not enter the jurisdiction of Ambilikai Police Station.

Source reference: p. 5

The petitioner must submit the necessary documents and a copy of the order to the prison authorities.

Source reference: p. 5

No costs were awarded.

Source reference: p. 5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

JebavsThe Deputy Inspector General

Madras High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment