Facts
The applicant, a Senior Scientific Assistant (Photo) at the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL), CBI, filed an Original Application (OA) challenging the seniority list of Senior Scientific Assistants issued on April 26, 2019
Source reference: p.3He sought a direction for the respondents to prepare a fresh seniority list in accordance with the 1986 recruitment rules and to consider his name for promotion to Senior Scientific Officer Grade-II
Source reference: p.3During the proceedings, the applicant’s appearance was noted as erratic
Source reference: p.3Following the death of the applicant’s counsel, the Tribunal directed that fresh notice be issued to the applicant
Source reference: p.3Despite a notice being issued on March 9, 2026, which was subsequently returned, the applicant failed to appear or arrange representation for the hearing
Source reference: p.4Issues
1. Whether the Original Application is liable for dismissal due to the applicant's failure to prosecute the matter
Source reference: p.4Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the procedural principle of dismissal for default (non-prosecution).
Source reference: p.4This principle allows a court or tribunal to terminate proceedings when the initiating party fails to appear or demonstrate a continued interest in pursuing the litigation, thereby preventing the abuse of the judicial process and ensuring the efficient management of the court's docket
Source reference: p.4Reasoning
The Tribunal examined the procedural history and the applicant's conduct during the litigation.
Source reference: no citationIt noted that the applicant's appearances had been consistently irregular
Source reference: p.3Upon the demise of the applicant's counsel of record, the Tribunal took steps to ensure the applicant was notified of the proceedings, directing both the Registry and the respondents' counsel to issue notices
Source reference: p.3Evidence was presented that a notice dated March 9, 2026, was dispatched but returned
Source reference: p.4On the final hearing date of March 23, 2026, no representation was made on behalf of the applicant.
Source reference: p.4The Tribunal inferred from this repeated absence and the failure to respond to notices that the applicant was no longer interested in prosecuting the case
Source reference: p.4Holding
The Tribunal concluded that the applicant demonstrated a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Consequently, the Original Application was dismissed for default
Source reference: p.4The Tribunal ordered no costs
Source reference: p.4Original Court PDF
P E MOHANKUMARvsM/o Home Affairs
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in