CAT - Chennai

Original Application dismissed for default due to applicant’s failure to appear and prosecute the matter.

P E MOHANKUMAR vs M/o Home Affairs

CAT - ChennaiJUDGMENT: March 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a Senior Scientific Assistant (Photo) at the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL), CBI, filed an Original Application (OA) challenging the seniority list of Senior Scientific Assistants issued on April 26, 2019

Source reference: p.3

He sought a direction for the respondents to prepare a fresh seniority list in accordance with the 1986 recruitment rules and to consider his name for promotion to Senior Scientific Officer Grade-II

Source reference: p.3

During the proceedings, the applicant’s appearance was noted as erratic

Source reference: p.3

Following the death of the applicant’s counsel, the Tribunal directed that fresh notice be issued to the applicant

Source reference: p.3

Despite a notice being issued on March 9, 2026, which was subsequently returned, the applicant failed to appear or arrange representation for the hearing

Source reference: p.4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Original Application is liable for dismissal due to the applicant's failure to prosecute the matter

Source reference: p.4
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the procedural principle of dismissal for default (non-prosecution).

Source reference: p.4

This principle allows a court or tribunal to terminate proceedings when the initiating party fails to appear or demonstrate a continued interest in pursuing the litigation, thereby preventing the abuse of the judicial process and ensuring the efficient management of the court's docket

Source reference: p.4
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal examined the procedural history and the applicant's conduct during the litigation.

Source reference: no citation

It noted that the applicant's appearances had been consistently irregular

Source reference: p.3

Upon the demise of the applicant's counsel of record, the Tribunal took steps to ensure the applicant was notified of the proceedings, directing both the Registry and the respondents' counsel to issue notices

Source reference: p.3

Evidence was presented that a notice dated March 9, 2026, was dispatched but returned

Source reference: p.4

On the final hearing date of March 23, 2026, no representation was made on behalf of the applicant.

Source reference: p.4

The Tribunal inferred from this repeated absence and the failure to respond to notices that the applicant was no longer interested in prosecuting the case

Source reference: p.4
05

Holding

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant demonstrated a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.

Consequently, the Original Application was dismissed for default

Source reference: p.4

The Tribunal ordered no costs

Source reference: p.4
CAT - Chennai

Original Court PDF

P E MOHANKUMARvsM/o Home Affairs

CAT - Chennai · March 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment