01Facts
The claimant, aged 43, was injured in a motor-vehicle accident on 11 April 2003. The Tribunal awarded him ₹1,60,000. Medical evidence established, among other injuries, loss of the right eye and facial and arm injuries, resulting in permanent disability assessed at 68%.
pp. 1–4The claimant appealed seeking enhancement, principally on the assessment of functional disability and loss of earning capacity, and under other heads of compensation. The respondents filed no appeal or cross-objection challenging the findings on negligence.
pp. 1–4The claimant’s asserted income from his confectionery business was not supported by reliable material.
p. 402Issues
i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹1,60,000 was inadequate and required enhancement, particularly in light of the claimant’s permanent disability and resulting loss of earning capacity.
p. 2, 4ii.2. Whether the claimant was entitled to additional compensation under other heads, including loss of income during treatment, pain and suffering, future amenities, and medical, transportation, diet and attendant expenses.
pp. 2–3, 5–603Law Applied
In assessing loss of earning capacity, the Court applied the multiplier method in Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., 2009 (6) SCC 121, using the multiplier appropriate to the claimant’s age.
p. 4It applied National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors., 2017 (16) SCC 680, to add future prospects to income; for the 43-year-old claimant, the addition was 25%.
p. 4The Court assessed functional disability by reference to the effect of the injuries on the claimant’s earning capacity, and used the minimum wage for a skilled worker where reliable evidence of actual income was absent.
p. 4Compensation was also assessed for proved or reasonably established pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, while future medical expenses required supporting evidence.
pp. 5–604Reasoning
The Court found that the claimant’s facial deformity and restricted jaw movement, together with the other injuries and permanent disability, supported treating his functional disability as 68%.
p. 4Because no reliable evidence established his claimed monthly earnings of ₹6,000–₹7,000, the Court used the 2003 skilled-worker minimum wage of ₹2,400 per month. It added 25% for future prospects, applied the multiplier of 14, and calculated loss of earning capacity at ₹3,42,720.
p. 4, 6It further assessed nine months’ loss of income during treatment at ₹21,600, increased pain-and-suffering compensation to ₹50,000, allowed ₹25,000 for medical expenses, transportation, special diet and attendant charges, and awarded ₹1,00,000 for loss of future amenities and prospects.
pp. 5–6No amount was awarded for future medical expenses because the claimant had produced no supporting evidence.
p. 505Holding
The appeal was allowed. Total compensation was enhanced from ₹1,60,000 to ₹5,39,320, resulting in an enhancement of ₹3,79,320.
pp. 6–7The enhanced amount carries interest at 7.5% per annum from the date the claim petition was filed until realization; liability remains as provided in the Tribunal’s award.
pp. 6–7Original Court PDF
Ashok KumarvsHardam Singh & Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
