01Facts
The petitioners were appointed as Library Assistants in the A.C. Joshi Library, Panjab University.
¶ 3They alleged that Library Assistants appointed before 31 March 2000 received the regular pay scale of Rs. 5,480–8,925, while those appointed after that date—including the petitioners—were paid a fixed salary of Rs. 4,000 per month, despite having the same qualifications and performing the same duties and responsibilities as regular Library Assistants.
¶ 3They sought the minimum of the regular pay scale from the date their pay was fixed at Rs. 4,000.
¶ 1 · ¶ 4As both petitions sought the same relief, the High Court decided them by a common judgment.
¶ 202Issues
i.Whether temporary Library Assistants performing the same duties as regular Library Assistants are entitled to the minimum of the regular pay scale.
¶ 803Law Applied
The Court applied the principle of “equal pay for equal work” as stated by the Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Jagjit Singh, (2017) 1 SCC 148. Temporary employees—including contractual employees—who perform duties and responsibilities equivalent to those of regular employees holding the same or corresponding posts are entitled to wages at the minimum of the regular pay scale, subject to the applicable criteria.
¶ 9 · ¶ 10The Court also referred to the principle that this entitlement applies where the temporary employees possess the prescribed qualifications and perform the same work as regular employees.
¶ 1004Reasoning
The petitioners’ case was that their qualifications, duties and responsibilities matched those of regular Library Assistants, but their pay had been reduced to a fixed amount of Rs. 4,000 per month.
¶ 3 · ¶ 4Applying Jagjit Singh, the Court held that temporary status alone did not justify paying them less than the minimum of the regular scale when they performed the same work.
¶ 9 · ¶ 10It therefore accepted the petitioners’ claim to minimum-scale wages.
¶ 9 · ¶ 1005Holding
Both writ petitions were allowed. The petitioners were held entitled to the minimum of the regular pay scale from the dates on which they began receiving fixed pay of Rs. 4,000 per month, together with interest at 12% per annum.
¶ 11The petitioners were directed to provide the University with their appointment dates and the dates from which fixed pay was paid; the University was then directed to calculate and grant the amounts due with interest.
¶ 11Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.
¶ 12Original Court PDF
Shalu Bedi And Ors.vsPb., Uni. Chd.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
