Gujarat High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Paraplegic Bus Passenger’s Compensation Raised To ₹49.97 Lakh As Gujarat HC Assesses 100% Disability

AAMIN ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKHv.RAFIKBHAI ABDULBHAI JERAM

Paraplegic Bus Passenger’s Compensation Raised To ₹49.97 Lakh As Gujarat HC Assesses 100% Disability. AAMIN ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKH vs RAFIKBHAI ABDULBHAI JERAM. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the claimant’s income should be assessed at Rs. 7,000 per month, rather than Rs. 3,000, based on the salary certificate

The court held

The appeal was partly allowed.

It also directed

The Court determined total compensation of Rs. 49,97,300 and ordered an additional Rs. 34,15,400, with interest from the claim-petition date at 7.5% on Rs. 7,56,000 and 9% on the remaining Rs. 26,59,400.

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within ten weeks, for disbursement by NEFT/RTGS after verification

01Facts

The claimant was a bus occupant injured in an accident on 4 July 2006 and became paraplegic

¶ 1 · p. 1

The Tribunal assessed his disability at 80%, took his monthly income as Rs. 3,000, and awarded compensation

¶ 2–3 · p. 1

In appeal, the claimant relied on a salary certificate showing earnings of Rs. 7,000 per month from Garg Medical Store, his Diploma in Pharmacy, and the suspension of his pharmacy licence after he became immobile

¶ 4 · pp. 1–2

02Issues

i.1. Whether the claimant’s income should be assessed at Rs. 7,000 per month, rather than Rs. 3,000, based on the salary certificate

¶ 4–5 · pp. 1–2

ii.2. Whether the claimant’s paraplegia warranted assessment of 100% disability and enhancement of compensation under the relevant heads

¶ 6–11 · pp. 2–4

03Law Applied

The judgment cites no statute or precedent. It applies the principles governing assessment of motor-accident compensation: proved income informs the calculation of future loss of earnings; future prospects and an age-appropriate multiplier are applied to that income; and disability is assessed by reference to its effect on the claimant’s capacity to work.

¶ 5–7 · pp. 2–3

Compensation may also be awarded for non-pecuniary loss and necessary care-related expenses, including pain and suffering, attendant charges, transportation, special diet, and loss of amenities

¶ 8–11 · pp. 2–4

04Reasoning

The Court accepted the salary certificate as support for monthly income of Rs. 7,000 and considered the claimant’s paraplegia to prevent him from doing any work, warranting 100% disability

¶ 5–6 · p. 2

Applying 40% future prospects and a multiplier of 18, it assessed loss of future income at Rs. 21,16,800

¶ 6–7 · pp. 2–3

It increased compensation for pain and suffering, attendant charges, transportation, and loss of amenities, while maintaining the Tribunal’s medical-expense award

¶ 8–11 · pp. 2–4

05Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

¶ 11–13 · pp. 3–4

The Court determined total compensation of Rs. 49,97,300 and ordered an additional Rs. 34,15,400, with interest from the claim-petition date at 7.5% on Rs. 7,56,000 and 9% on the remaining Rs. 26,59,400.

¶ 11–13 · pp. 3–4

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within ten weeks, for disbursement by NEFT/RTGS after verification

¶ 11–13 · pp. 3–4
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

AAMIN ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKHvsRAFIKBHAI ABDULBHAI JERAM

Gujarat High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment