01Facts
The claimant was a bus occupant injured in an accident on 4 July 2006 and became paraplegic
¶ 1 · p. 1The Tribunal assessed his disability at 80%, took his monthly income as Rs. 3,000, and awarded compensation
¶ 2–3 · p. 1In appeal, the claimant relied on a salary certificate showing earnings of Rs. 7,000 per month from Garg Medical Store, his Diploma in Pharmacy, and the suspension of his pharmacy licence after he became immobile
¶ 4 · pp. 1–202Issues
i.1. Whether the claimant’s income should be assessed at Rs. 7,000 per month, rather than Rs. 3,000, based on the salary certificate
¶ 4–5 · pp. 1–2ii.2. Whether the claimant’s paraplegia warranted assessment of 100% disability and enhancement of compensation under the relevant heads
¶ 6–11 · pp. 2–403Law Applied
The judgment cites no statute or precedent. It applies the principles governing assessment of motor-accident compensation: proved income informs the calculation of future loss of earnings; future prospects and an age-appropriate multiplier are applied to that income; and disability is assessed by reference to its effect on the claimant’s capacity to work.
¶ 5–7 · pp. 2–3Compensation may also be awarded for non-pecuniary loss and necessary care-related expenses, including pain and suffering, attendant charges, transportation, special diet, and loss of amenities
¶ 8–11 · pp. 2–404Reasoning
The Court accepted the salary certificate as support for monthly income of Rs. 7,000 and considered the claimant’s paraplegia to prevent him from doing any work, warranting 100% disability
¶ 5–6 · p. 2Applying 40% future prospects and a multiplier of 18, it assessed loss of future income at Rs. 21,16,800
¶ 6–7 · pp. 2–3It increased compensation for pain and suffering, attendant charges, transportation, and loss of amenities, while maintaining the Tribunal’s medical-expense award
¶ 8–11 · pp. 2–405Holding
The appeal was partly allowed.
¶ 11–13 · pp. 3–4The Court determined total compensation of Rs. 49,97,300 and ordered an additional Rs. 34,15,400, with interest from the claim-petition date at 7.5% on Rs. 7,56,000 and 9% on the remaining Rs. 26,59,400.
¶ 11–13 · pp. 3–4The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within ten weeks, for disbursement by NEFT/RTGS after verification
¶ 11–13 · pp. 3–4Original Court PDF
AAMIN ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKHvsRAFIKBHAI ABDULBHAI JERAM
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
