Facts
The applicant, Shivam Tiwari, was arrested on February 14, 2026, by the Crime Branch, Gwalior, in connection with Crime No. 09/2026
Source reference: para. 2The prosecution alleged that the applicant and a co-accused were apprehended near the Gwalior–Jhansi bypass with illegal firearms in their possession
Source reference: para. 3The applicant moved the High Court for bail after the investigation was completed and the charge-sheet was filed, arguing that the co-accused, Ankit Sharma, had already been granted bail and that his own case stood on similar footing
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to the benefit of bail based on the principle of parity with the co-accused
Source reference: para. 4Whether continued pre-trial detention is warranted following the completion of the investigation and filing of the charge-sheet
Source reference: para. 4, 7Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) regarding the grant of bail
Source reference: para. 1It considered the penal provisions of Section 25 of the Arms Act
Source reference: para. 2Furthermore, the court relied on the judicial principle of parity in bail matters and the fundamental doctrine that prolonged pre-trial detention is an "anathema to the concept of liberty"
Source reference: para. 4, 7Reasoning
The court reasoned that since the investigation had concluded and the charge-sheet was filed, there was no further requirement for the applicant’s custodial interrogation
Source reference: para. 4The court noted that the co-accused had been granted bail on February 26, 2026, in M.Cr.C. No. 9671/2026, and since the applicant’s role was similar, the principle of parity applied
Source reference: para. 4Additionally, the court took into account that the trial was unlikely to conclude in the near future and that the applicant, being a permanent resident of District Morena, posed a minimal risk of absconding or tampering with evidence
Source reference: para. 4, 7Holding
The court allowed the bail application, holding that the totality of circumstances and the need to preserve personal liberty justified the applicant’s release
The court directed the applicant to be released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one solvent surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with the trial, non-tampering of evidence, and a "zero-tolerance" clause stating that the commission of any further offence would result in the automatic cancellation of bail
Source reference: para. 8-9Original Court PDF
Shivam TiwarivsState Of Madhya Pradesh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in