Chhattisgarh High Court

Parity in Anticipatory Bail for Alleged Financial Fraud involving Similarly Situated Co-accused granted Relief.

TULSINAND SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 24, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Tulsinand Sahu, filed his first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 433/2025.

Source reference: para. 1-2

The prosecution alleged that the main accused, Ramnarayan Sahu, and others induced the complainant to invest ₹39,10,000 in the share market with a promise of doubling it, which they ultimately failed to return.

Source reference: para. 1-2

The applicant contended he was falsely implicated, asserting he was himself a victim who had paid ₹12,00,000 to the main accused and had filed a prior complaint regarding the same.

Source reference: para. 3

A co-accused, Dharanidhar Patel, had already been granted bail by the High Court.

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS 2023

Source reference: p. 1 / para. 1

2. Whether the principle of parity applies to the applicant’s case in light of the bail granted to a similarly situated co-accused

Source reference: p. 3 / para. 6
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of anticipatory bail

Source reference: p. 1

principles of parity in criminal jurisprudence, where an applicant may be entitled to bail if a similarly situated co-accused has already been granted such relief

Source reference: p. 3

The court also assessed the necessity of custodial interrogation and the potential for the applicant to cooperate with the investigation

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The Court examined the nature of the dispute and the applicant's role, noting that no specific allegations were made against him by the complainant and that he claimed to be a victim of the main accused himself

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The Court analyzed the investigation status, observing that the charge sheet had already been filed against the main accused and that the applicant had expressed a willingness to cooperate, rendering custodial interrogation unnecessary

Source reference: para. 3

Crucially, the Court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused Dharanidhar Patel had been granted anticipatory bail by the same Hon’ble High Court in MCRCA No. 531 of 2026 on 10.04.2026

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

Based on these factors, the Court determined that the applicant was entitled to similar relief

The Court allowed the MCRCA and granted anticipatory bail to Tulsinand Sahu. The holding directed that, in the event of arrest, the applicant be released upon executing a personal bond and providing one local surety, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, attending all trial dates, and not involving himself in similar future offences. The application was disposed of with a directive to verify the applicant's identity via Aadhaar credentials

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

TULSINAND SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment