Facts
The State of Tamil Nadu preferred an intra-court appeal challenging a Writ Court order dated January 18, 2024, in W.P. No. 6485 of 2023
Source reference: p.1The original order directed the State to count 50% of the service rendered by the respondent as a Part-Time Panchayat Clerk for the purpose of pensionary benefits
Source reference: p.2The State contended that part-time service cannot be equated with the temporary full-time service contemplated under the pension rules
Source reference: p.3Issues
1. Whether 50% of the service rendered in a part-time capacity (as a Part-Time Panchayat Clerk) can be counted for the purpose of calculating pensionary benefits under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978
Source reference: p.3, para. 30Law Applied
Rule 11 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, which allows for counting 50% of temporary service provided the employment was in a "whole-time job" and not a "part-time job"
Source reference: p.3, para. 26Article 14 cannot be invoked to perpetuate an illegality or compel a public authority to repeat an erroneous order, as established by Full Bench judgments (referenced via P.L.S. Palaniappan)
Source reference: p.3-4, para. 29Recent common judgment in W.A.No.1569 of 2026 etc. batch (dated 23.06.2026), which consolidated the law on this subject
Source reference: p.2, para. 2Reasoning
The court reasoned that pension is a deferred portion of wages operating strictly within the framework of the 1978 Rules
Source reference: p.2, para. 26Rule 11 is a welfare provision intended for temporary full-time employees; extending it to part-time staff would contradict the unambiguous language of the statute
Source reference: p.3, para. 26The Bench observed that many prior Single Judge and Division Bench orders granting such relief were "running counter to the Pension Rules" and were based on implementing previous erroneous court orders rather than the actual law
Source reference: p.3, para. 27-28Applying the Full Bench principle, the court determined that even if the State had failed to appeal similar orders in the past, it was not precluded from challenging the current order, as wrong precedents do not create a legal right
Source reference: p.3-4, para. 29All prior judgments allowing the counting of 50% part-time service were declared to have lost their status as precedents
Source reference: p.4, para. 31Holding
The court answered the issue in the negative, holding that part-time service cannot be counted toward pension under Rule 11 of the 1978 Rules
The Writ Appeal was allowed, and the order of the Writ Court dated 18.01.2024 in W.P. No. 6485 of 2023 was set aside. No costs were awarded
Source reference: p.5, para. 3Original Court PDF
The State of Tamil Nadu,vsR.Rajendran
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in