Facts
The petitioners in both writ petitions are residents of District Surajpur who constructed houses on land they claim is forest land
Source reference: p. 4-5In WPC No. 3271/2022, petitioners challenged an impugned notice dated 24.05.2022 issued by the Tahsildar (Respondent No. 4)
Source reference: para. 2In WPC No. 3269/2022, petitioners sought to set aside the demolition actions initiated by the authorities
Source reference: para. 2During the hearing, the petitioners limited their prayer, seeking a direction to the authorities to decide their claims under the forest rights legislation and requested interim protection from eviction pending such a decision
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to statutory consideration of their claims over the subject land under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, prior to eviction or demolition
Source reference: para. 32. Whether coercive action can be stayed pending the adjudication of rights by the competent revenue and forest authorities
Source reference: para. 5Law Applied
The Court applied the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (the "Act, 2006"), which provides a legal framework for recognizing and vesting forest rights in forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers who have been residing on such lands for generations
Source reference: para. 3-4Reasoning
The Court did not adjudicate upon the merits of the petitioners' title or the legality of the construction
Source reference: para. 4The Court focused on the procedural safeguards inherent in the Act, 2006. It reasoned that if the petitioners claim rights over forest land, they must first approach the competent authority via appropriate applications
Source reference: para. 4To ensure that the statutory remedy is not rendered academic by the destruction of the property in question, the Court found it necessary to grant a time-bound opportunity for the petitioners to file their claims and mandated that the status quo be maintained (no coercive steps) until those claims are decided
Source reference: para. 4-5Holding
The High Court disposed of the petitions without expressing an opinion on the merits.
The petitioners must file applications under the Act, 2006 within 30 days from the receipt of the order; the competent authority must consider and decide these applications in accordance with the law expeditiously; and no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners until a decision is reached on said applications
Source reference: para. 4-5Failure to file the applications within the stipulated 30-day window will result in the loss of the order's efficacy
Source reference: para. 6Original Court PDF
CHHOTELALvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in