Uttarakhand High Court
Human Rights LawAdministrative and Public Law

Police must assess threat perception within 24 hours and provide protection if required.

SHAH VAQAR CHISHTI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High CourtJUDGMENT: October 13, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Police must assess threat perception within 24 hours and provide protection if required.. SHAH VAQAR CHISHTI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner sought a writ directing the police authorities to assess threats to him and his family and provide protection.

Source reference: paras. 4–7

He claimed that private respondents, including the Mutawalli of Dargah Shah Wilayat, suspected him of being behind an FIR filed by another person and had consequently developed enmity towards him.

Source reference: paras. 4–7

The petitioner had submitted a representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, on 3 October 2026 seeking action on the perceived threat.

Source reference: paras. 4–7
02

Issues

Whether the police should be directed to consider the petitioner’s representation and assess the threat perception to him and his family.

Source reference: paras. 6–7

Whether protection should be provided to the petitioner and his family if the threat assessment warrants it.

Source reference: para. 9
03

Law Applied

The judgment cites no particular statute, precedent, or substantive legal test.

Source reference: paras. 7–9

The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction to direct the competent police authority to consider the petitioner’s representation, assess the alleged threat, and provide protection if required.

Source reference: paras. 7–9
04

Reasoning

The petitioner sought a time-bound decision on his representation and an assessment of the alleged threat arising from the private respondents’ suspected hostility.

Source reference: paras. 5–7

The State did not oppose the requested direction.

Source reference: para. 8

In these circumstances, the Court disposed of the petition by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police to decide the representation, examine and assess the threat, and provide protection if required.

Source reference: para. 9
05

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, was directed to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 3 October 2026 within 24 hours of receiving a certified copy of the order, assess the threat to the petitioner and his family, and provide effective and adequate protection if required.

Source reference: para. 9
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

SHAH VAQAR CHISHTIvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment