Facts
The appellants’ lands situated in Village Devpura, Taluka Vav, District Banaskantha, were acquired for the Narmada Project main canal construction. Section 4 and Section 6 notifications were issued on 05.02.1997 and 10.07.1997, respectively
Source reference: para 3The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of ₹18,600/hectare for irrigated and ₹12,400/hectare for non-irrigated land on 04.09.1999
Source reference: para 3Dissatisfied, the claimants sought ₹50/sq. mtr. via Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act
Source reference: para 3.1The Reference Court granted additional compensation of ₹48.45/sq. mtr. (irrigated) and ₹38.75/sq. mtr. (non-irrigated)
Source reference: para 2The appellants filed these appeals seeking enhancement, citing a coordinate Bench judgment dated 15.07.2025 in similar matters
Source reference: para 4.1Issues
1. Whether the appellants are entitled to enhanced compensation based on the principle of Res-judicata or parity with related matters decided by a coordinate Bench involving the same acquisition project and similar geographical locations
Source reference: para 4.2, 6Law Applied
Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which provides for appeals against the Reference Court’s award
Source reference: para 1doctrine of Res-judicata and judicial consistency/parity, holding that once a coordinate Bench determines a fair market value for a group of matters arising from the same notification or project for adjacent villages, those findings apply to "left out" matters in the same group
Source reference: para 4.1, 4.2, 6Reasoning
The Court observed that these appeals were part of a larger group of matters arising from a common judgment and award dated 02.03.2015
Source reference: para 1, 2The Court referred to the coordinate Bench's decision in FA No. 1999 of 2017, where it was determined that Village Devpura is only 3.00 km from Village Sandhar, for which higher compensation had already been upheld
Source reference: para 6 / para 7 of cited judgmentBecause the present appeals arose from the same group of Land Acquisition Reference (LAR) cases, the Court held that the principle of Res-judicata (or parity) was attracted.
Source reference: para 6Consequently, the finding that both irrigated and non-irrigated lands deserve uniform enhancement was adopted to ensure judicial uniformity
Source reference: para 6, 7Holding
The Court allowed the appeals and enhanced the additional compensation to ₹96.55/sq. mtr. for both irrigated and non-irrigated lands, along with all statutory benefits
The respondents were directed to deposit the additional amount with the Reference Court within 12 weeks for disbursement to the claimants after due verification and deduction of any applicable Court fees
Source reference: para 8, 9Original Court PDF
PATEL AANDA SAMTAvsDEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in