Calcutta High Court

Procession rights are subject to executive restrictions on culmination points and strict police oversight to maintain communal harmony.

KHAJUTTY SUFISM MADARIA ORGANISATION vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Calcutta High CourtJUDGMENT: June 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a religious organization, filed a writ petition seeking police permission to hold a Muharram procession on June 26, 2026, under Bagnan Police Station, Howrah.

Source reference: p. 2

Specifically, they sought to culminate the procession at Khajuti Amtala Karbala Sarif.

Source reference: p. 2

Respondent No. 7, representing a rival organization (Sufism Madaria Organisation), intervened, citing a previous High Court judgment regarding the same location.

Source reference: p. 2

The State authorities flagged concerns regarding existing civil and criminal proceedings and the history of rivalry between the two groups.

Source reference: p. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioner organization should be permitted to convene a Muharram procession and culminate the same at Khajuti Amtala Karbala Sarif.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 8
03

Law Applied

The Court relied on the principle of res integra and judicial consistency, specifically applying the directions set forth in a coordinate Bench judgment dated July 4, 2025, in Sufism Madaria Organisation Vs. The State of West Bengal Ors. (WPA 14724 of 2025).

Source reference: p. 2, para. 4

To maintain public order and streamline religious activities, processions could be allowed but restricted from culminating at Khajuti Amtala Karbala Sarif, directing them instead to a Darga as determined by police authorities.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 9

The Court also exercised its jurisdiction to impose reasonable restrictions on the right to assembly to ensure public peace and sound pollution compliance.

Source reference: p. 4-5
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the issue was largely settled by the 2025 judgment, which had not been interfered with by any higher forum.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 10

Since the previous ruling specifically prohibited any applicant from culminating Muharram processions at the disputed Karbala Sarif to prevent conflict, the Court found no reason to deviate from this restriction.

Source reference: p. 4, para. 9, 11

To balance religious freedom with public safety, the Court applied a set of nine stringent conditions, including limiting the number of participants to 750, prohibiting the brandishing of weapons or "lathis," banning Disc Jockeys to comply with pollution norms, and requiring the appointment of responsible volunteers.

Source reference: p. 4-5

The timing of processions was left to police discretion to avoid "untoward incidents" between the rival factions.

Source reference: p. 6
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition by granting permission for the procession subject to the condition that it shall not culminate at Khajuti Amtala Karbala Sarif, but rather at a Darga as decided by the police.

The holding mandated strict adherence to nine specific conditions (limiting participants, prohibiting weapons/sound systems, and appointing 10 responsible persons per group).

Source reference: p. 4-6

The police were granted liberty to disperse processions in case of violations and were directed to deploy adequate force to maintain law and order on June 26, 2026.

Source reference: p. 6
Calcutta High Court

Original Court PDF

KHAJUTTY SUFISM MADARIA ORGANISATIONvsSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Calcutta High Court · June 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment