Facts
The five petitioners, working as Headmasters (Middle School) in District Surajpur, were initially promoted to said posts via an order dated 07.09.2012.
Source reference: p.1-3Following directions from the Commissioner of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe Development to investigate promotion discrepancies, the order dated 07.09.2012 was cancelled on 21.09.2012 due to identified irregularities.
Source reference: p.3-4The petitioners were subsequently granted fresh promotions on 19.09.2013.
Source reference: p.4The petitioners challenged the order dated 14.01.2022 passed by Respondent No. 3, which rejected their claim to have their seniority reckoned from the date of the original (cancelled) promotion order of 2012.
Source reference: p.3Issues
1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to seniority from the date of an initial promotion order that was subsequently cancelled due to procedural irregularities.
Source reference: p.4 / para. 52. Whether the rejection of the petitioners' claim for seniority by the respondent authorities was arbitrary or legally infirm.
Source reference: p.5 / para. 6Law Applied
Once an appointment or promotion order is cancelled due to irregularities in the selection process, it ceases to exist in the eyes of the law and cannot form the basis for subsequent service benefits such as seniority.
Source reference: p.4Seniority is generally reckoned from the date of a valid and subsisting appointment or promotion order.
Source reference: p.4-5Reasoning
The Court reasoned that because the 2012 promotion order was formally cancelled to rectify "discrepancies and irregularities" in the selection process, it lacked the legal character required to confer any vested rights upon the petitioners.
Source reference: p.4The subsequent promotion granted in 2013 was a fresh administrative action, and the intervening period or the prior cancelled order could not be "resurrected" for the purpose of granting back-dated seniority.
Source reference: p.4-5The Court found no evidence of arbitrariness, as the State’s action was a corrective measure for a flawed promotion exercise.
Source reference: p.5Holding
A cancelled promotion order cannot confer any right to claim seniority from that prior date.
The Court found no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order dated 14.01.2022; accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed, and the claim for seniority from 07.09.2012 was rejected.
Source reference: p.5 / para. 7Original Court PDF
SOBHNATH CHOUBEYvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in