Facts
The petitioner challenged orders under Sections 74(9) and 107 of the CGST/KGST Acts concerning tax periods 2023–24 and 2024–25, as well as a garnishee notice in Form GST DRC-13 under Section 79(1)(c).
Source reference: pp.4, 7–8The Section 74 proceedings arose from the petitioner’s transactions with M/s Parmeshwari Distributor, whose GST registration had been cancelled on 20 December 2024, retrospectively from 23 August 2023.
Source reference: p.5In a separate writ petition, the High Court quashed that cancellation decision on 6 June 2025 and restored the cancellation proceedings for reconsideration; the registration was subsequently restored.
Source reference: p.6The petitioner’s response to the tax show-cause notices had sought to await the outcome of those proceedings.
Source reference: p.6Issues
1. Whether, despite dismissal of the petitioner’s appeals under Section 107, the proceedings should be restored to the show-cause-notice stage to allow a further response and fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority.
Source reference: p.42. Whether the challenged orders and the garnishee notice should be quashed in consequence of restoring the proceedings.
Source reference: pp.7–8Law Applied
Sections 74 and 74(9) of the CGST/KGST Acts govern the show-cause and adjudication proceedings concerning the alleged tax liability; Section 107 provides for an appeal against the adjudication order; and Section 79(1)(c) concerns recovery by notice to a third party.
Source reference: pp.4, 7–8The Court applied the procedural principle that, in the circumstances of this case, the petitioner should have an opportunity to place relevant circumstances and grounds before the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision.
Source reference: pp.4, 7–8The judgment did not rely on any cited precedent.
Source reference: pp.4, 7–8Reasoning
The tax proceedings were premised on the cancellation of the supplier’s registration.
Source reference: pp.5–6Since that cancellation had been quashed and the registration restored, the premise underlying the show-cause notices had materially changed.
Source reference: pp.5–6The petitioner had also sought to await the outcome of the supplier’s restored cancellation proceedings.
Source reference: p.6In those circumstances, the Court considered it appropriate to reopen the matter at the show-cause stage, enabling the petitioner to provide a further response and the Deputy Commissioner to consider all relevant circumstances and decide afresh.
Source reference: p.6Holding
The Court answered the central issue in the petitioner’s favour and allowed the petition in part.
It quashed the specified orders-in-appeal, adjudication orders, summaries of the orders, and the Form GST DRC-13 notice, restoring the proceedings to the show-cause-notice stage.
Source reference: pp.7–8The petitioner was directed to file a response without further notice on 24 October 2026, and the Deputy Commissioner was directed to examine the circumstances and pass a detailed order.
Source reference: p.7Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20172
KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 20172
Original Court PDF
M/S SS DECORvsTHE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX APPEALS - 9
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
