Facts
The court heard two connected petitions filed by closely related family members seeking the quashing of cross-FIRs (No. 527/2021 and 528/2021) registered at P.S. Kirti Nagar
Source reference: p. 2, para. 1-2FIR 527/2021 was registered by a daughter-in-law alleging threats and attempted sexual assault by the petitioners
Source reference: p. 2, para. 4FIR 528/2021 was registered by a paternal aunt alleging verbal abuse and assault during a scuffle
Source reference: p. 2, para. 5Although charge sheets were filed in both cases, the parties subsequently entered into a Compromise Deed dated April 25, 2026, with the help of community members
Source reference: p. 2, para. 6-8The complainants appeared before the Court and confirmed they entered the settlement voluntarily
Source reference: p. 3, para. 9-10Issues
1. Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings in non-compoundable cases based on a private settlement between closely related parties
Source reference: p. 2-3, para. 6, 12Law Applied
Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 [formerly Section 482 of the CrPC], which grants the High Court inherent powers to pass orders necessary to give effect to any order under the Code, prevent abuse of the process of any Court, or otherwise to secure the ends of justice
Source reference: p. 3, para. 13The principle that where matrimonial or family disputes are amicably settled, and the nature of the allegations is such that a conviction is unlikely, the proceedings may be quashed to achieve the ends of justice
Source reference: p. 3, para. 12Reasoning
The Court observed that the parties are closely related and have resolved all disputes with the intervention of society members
Source reference: p. 2, para. 3, 6By examining the nature of the allegations and the fact that the complainants expressed "no objection" to the quashing, the Court reasoned that continuing the criminal proceedings would be a futile exercise and would not serve any useful purpose
Source reference: p. 3, para. 10, 12To ensure the settlement was bona fide, the Court verified the identities of the parties through the Investigating Officer and confirmed that the compromise was reached without coercion or influence
Source reference: p. 3, para. 9-10Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and quashed FIR Nos. 527/2021 and 528/2021, along with all consequential proceedings, to secure the ends of justice
The quashing was made subject to the petitioners in each case depositing a cost of Rs. 30,000/- (totaling Rs. 60,000/-) to the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) West District within four weeks
Source reference: p. 3, para. 14Proof of deposit and original affidavits must be submitted to the Trial Court within six weeks
Source reference: p. 3, para. 15Original Court PDF
Manmeet Singh Saggu & Ors.vsThe State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in