Karnataka High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Quashing petitions withdrawn with liberty to challenge subsequent criminal proceedings.

MR. MAHADEVAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA PATTANASHETTI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Quashing petitions withdrawn with liberty to challenge subsequent criminal proceedings.. MR. MAHADEVAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA PATTANASHETTI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners sought to quash proceedings arising from three police cases: Vidyanagar P.S. Crime No. 108/2025, Bendigeri P.S. Crime No. 106/2025, and Keshwapur P.S. Crime No. 126/2025.

Source reference: p. 5–7

The petitions invoked Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: p. 1

While the petitions were pending, charge sheets were filed in all three cases and further court proceedings were initiated.

Source reference: p. 5–7

The petitioners then filed memos seeking permission to withdraw the petitions, with liberty to file fresh petitions challenging the further criminal proceedings.

Source reference: p. 5–7
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners should be permitted to withdraw the criminal petitions after charge sheets had been filed and further proceedings initiated.

Source reference: p. 5–7

2. Whether the petitions should be dismissed with liberty to file fresh petitions challenging the further criminal proceedings.

Source reference: p. 5–7
03

Law Applied

The petitions were brought under Section 482 CrPC, stated in the order as corresponding to Section 528 BNSS, which provides the procedural basis invoked for seeking quashing of criminal proceedings.

Source reference: p. 1, 5–7

The order does not formulate or apply any substantive legal test, cite precedents, or determine the scope of either provision; it disposes of the petitions on the petitioners’ withdrawal requests.

Source reference: p. 5–7
04

Reasoning

The petitioners informed the Court that charge sheets had been filed and that proceedings had advanced in each case, making the pending petitions infructuous in their view.

Source reference: p. 5–7

They sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge the further proceedings by fresh petitions.

Source reference: p. 5–7

The Court accepted the withdrawal memos and supporting submissions; it did not examine the allegations, the merits of the charge sheets, or the grounds for quashing.

Source reference: p. 5–7
05

Holding

The Court dismissed all three criminal petitions as withdrawn, with liberty as sought by the petitioners to file fresh petitions challenging the further criminal proceedings.

No finding was made on the merits of the underlying cases.

Source reference: p. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

7 provisions across 4 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20234

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 19841

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

MR. MAHADEVAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA PATTANASHETTIvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment