CAT - Delhi

Railways must count 50% casual and full temporary service for pensionary benefits.

Umesh Chand Saxena v. Union of India, OA 5002/2024

CAT - Delhi3 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Umesh Chand Saxena, retired as Technician Grade I from Northern Railway on 31.07.2017 after attaining superannuation.

Source reference: para. 4

He was initially engaged on a casual basis from 06.12.1976 to 19.07.1977.

Source reference: para. 5, 10

Subsequently, he was appointed as a Temporary Wireman from 09.10.1980 to 10.06.1983.

Source reference: para. 5, 10

He was then regularly appointed as a Gangman after a screening test on 31.07.1983.

Source reference: para. 5

The respondents issued a Pension Payment Order (PPO) on 04.08.2017, stating 31 years of qualifying service, and a revised PPO on 09.05.2018, changing the period for commutation of pension recovery from 01.08.2017-31.07.2032 to 09.05.2018-09.05.2033.

Source reference: para. 5

The applicant previously approached the Tribunal via OA/2509/2022, which was disposed of on 18.10.2023, directing respondents to pass a reasoned order on his representation.

Source reference: para. 6

The current OA challenges the impugned order dated 12/16.07.2022, which was issued in compliance with the Tribunal's earlier direction.

Source reference: para. 7

The applicant sought to count his entire service from 31.07.1983 as qualifying service and 50% of his casual service prior to 31.07.1983 for pensionary benefits, as well as to recover commutation for only 15 years from the date of retirement.

Source reference: para. 1

The relief concerning post-retirement passes was not pressed with liberty for future agitation.

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to have 50% of his casual service and his full service from 31.07.1983 counted as qualifying service for pensionary and retirement benefits.

Source reference: para. 1(i), 8

Whether the recovery period for the commuted pension amount should start from the date of retirement, i.e., 01.08.2017, for 15 years.

Source reference: para. 1(ii), 5
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in *Union of India & Ors. v. Rakesh Kumar & Ors.* (AIR 2017 SCC 1691), which clarifies that casual workers are entitled to reckon 50% of their service before obtaining temporary status for pension calculation, and 50% of their service after obtaining temporary status until regularization, for pension purposes.

Source reference: para. 8, 12

Rule 32 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993, states that service rendered as a substitute shall be counted for pensionary benefits from the date of completion of three months for teachers and four months for others of continuous service as substitute, followed by absorption in a regular Group C or Group D post without any break.

Source reference: para. 8, 14
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the applicant had worked on a casual basis from 06.12.1976 to 19.07.1977 and as a temporary Wireman from 09.10.1980 to 10.06.1983, prior to his regular appointment on 31.07.1983, which was established through the applicant's assertions, the respondents' non-denial, and the casual labour card mentioned in the applicant's biodata.

Source reference: para. 10, 11

Applying the *Rakesh Kumar* judgment, the Court concluded that the applicant was entitled to count 50% of his casual service for retirement benefits.

Source reference: para. 12, 13

Furthermore, even if initially appointed as a substitute, Rule 32 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993, mandates counting such service (after specified continuous periods) if followed by absorption in a regular post.

Source reference: para. 14, 15

Since the appointment on 25.07.1983 was on a temporary basis, the Court determined that this service should also be counted for retirement benefits based on the principles of *Rakesh Kumar*.

Source reference: para. 15

Regarding the commutation recovery, the Court found no justification for the respondents to revise the PPO to change the starting date of deduction from 01.08.2017 (date of retirement) to 09.05.2018 (date of revised PPO), therefore mandating adherence to the original start date.

Source reference: para. 16
05

Holding

The OA was allowed.

The Tribunal directed the respondents to count 50% of the applicant's casual service and his full service from 31.07.1983 until his superannuation for pension and retirement benefits.

Source reference: para. 17(1)

The deduction for commutation of pension was ordered to commence from 01.08.2017 for the admissible period.

Source reference: para. 17(2)

The applicant is entitled to consequential benefits, including revision of PPO, arrears of pension, and retirement benefits, with interest at admissible GPF rates.

Source reference: para. 17(3), 17(4)

These directions are to be complied with within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order.

Source reference: para. 17(5)
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

Umesh Chand Saxena v. Union of India, OA 5002/2024

CAT - Delhi

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment