Facts
Sarvjeetkumar Paras Pandit was travelling on Train No. 09465 with a valid e-ticket when he sustained injuries near Chhayapuri Railway Station; he died during treatment on 26 February 2023.
Source reference: para. 1–3, 6, 8–9His family sought compensation, and the Railway Claims Tribunal awarded ₹8,00,000 with 9% simple interest from the date of the incident.
Source reference: para. 1–3, 6, 8–9The Union of India appealed, contending that the deceased’s injuries were self-inflicted because he had pulled the alarm chain and jumped from the train to avoid criminal action.
Source reference: para. 1–3, 6, 8–9Issues
Whether the Railway Administration established that the deceased’s injuries were self-inflicted, so as to defeat the compensation claim
Source reference: para. 6, 10–12Whether the delayed DRM report could be relied upon against the claimants
Source reference: para. 9, 11–12Law Applied
Under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, an accidental fall from a passenger train may constitute an “untoward incident”; Section 123(b) concerns the relevant dependants.
Source reference: para. 4The Court also applied the principle stated in Sukhabhai Nanjibhai Makwana & Anr. v. Union of India, 2026 INSC 1056: where the Railway’s inquiry report is prepared belatedly and the delay is not attributable to the claimants, the Railway cannot take advantage of its own delay, and the report may be ignored.
Source reference: para. 11Reasoning
The Railway’s witnesses did not establish that the deceased had been handed over to the RPF or that he jumped from the train to avoid prosecution.
Source reference: para. 11–12The Station Master was not an eyewitness, and the RPF officer’s statement that the deceased had not been handed into his custody contradicted the Train Manager’s account.
Source reference: para. 11–12The Court therefore upheld the Tribunal’s rejection of the Railway’s version.
Source reference: para. 11–12It also noted that the incident occurred on 17 February 2023, while the DRM report was prepared on 11 September 2024, after the claim petition had been filed; applying Sukhabhai Nanjibhai Makwana, the Court treated the delayed report as no bar to the claim.
Source reference: para. 11–12Holding
The Court held that the Railway Administration had failed to establish that the deceased sustained self-inflicted injuries and found no infirmity in the Tribunal’s award.
It dismissed the appeal and directed the Tribunal to disburse the awarded amount with interest to the claimants after verification and deduction of any court-fee deficit.
Source reference: para. 12–14Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Railways Act, 19891
Original Court PDF
UNION OF INDIA THRO GENERAL MANAGERvsPARAS DEOPUJAN PANDIT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
