Facts
The Petitioner challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") dated August 27, 2022, for Assessment Year 2016-17
Source reference: para. 2Initially, the Assessing Officer issued a notice on May 17, 2021, under the old regime, utilizing time extensions provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 ("TOLA")
Source reference: para. 3Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in *Ashish Agarwal*, this notice was treated as a show-cause notice under the new Section 148A(b)
Source reference: para. 4The Revenue provided information to the Petitioner on June 21, 2022, and the Petitioner replied on July 6, 2022
Source reference: para. 7Subsequently, the Revenue issued an order under Section 148A(d) and the impugned notice under Section 148 on August 27, 2022
Source reference: para. 7Issues
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act dated August 27, 2022, was barred by limitation considering the "surviving time" principle
Source reference: para. 2, 5Law Applied
The Court applied the "surviving time" principle established by the Supreme Court in *Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal* (2024), which dictates that reassessment notices issued under the new regime must be within the limitation period surviving from the TOLA extensions
Source reference: para. 5, 9It also relied on *Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal* (2022) regarding the conversion of old notices to Section 148A(b) notices
Source reference: para. 4And the Gujarat High Court’s prior application of these principles in *Dhanraj Govindram Kella v. ITO* (2025)
Source reference: para. 6Specifically, the "surviving time" is calculated by excluding the period from the initial deemed notice (between April–June 2021) until the supply of information and the two-week response period allowed to the assessee
Source reference: para. 9Reasoning
The Court performed a mathematical verification of the limitation period based on the timelines provided by the Revenue.
Source reference: no citationFor Assessment Year 2016-17, the three-year limitation period originally fell within the TOLA window (March 20, 2020, to June 30, 2021)
Source reference: para. 6Under the *Rajeev Bansal* framework, after accounting for the time stayed during the *Ashish Agarwal* implementation—specifically from the supply of information (June 21, 2022) plus the response period (ending July 6, 2022)—the "surviving time" for the Assessing Officer to issue the actual Section 148 notice expired on August 19, 2022
Source reference: para. 7Since the impugned notice was issued on August 27, 2022, it was eight days beyond the permissible legal window
Source reference: para. 7, 9The Revenue's counsel could not controvert these dates
Source reference: para. 8Holding
The Court held that the notice dated August 27, 2022, was invalid as it was issued beyond the "surviving time" and was therefore time-barred
The Court quashed and set aside the order under Section 148A(d), the notice under Section 148, and all consequential proceedings
Source reference: para. 10Rule was made absolute
Source reference: para. 10Original Court PDF
M/S Ammann India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Gandhinagar [2026:GUJHC:12/03/2026]
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in