01Facts
The petitioner sought a writ declaring the action of Respondent No. 2 in refusing to receive, register, and release a sale deed relating to the residential western portion of House No. 43-546/54, situated in the A.P.S.R.T.C. Employees Cooperative Housing Society, Telangana, as arbitrary and illegal.
¶ 2At the hearing, the petitioner confined the relief sought to a direction requiring the registering authority to receive and process the document.
¶ 4The respondents stated that they would follow the procedure prescribed under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908.
¶ 502Issues
i.Whether the registering authority could refuse to receive and process the sale deed without following the procedure prescribed under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908.
¶ 4–6ii.Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction requiring the registering authority to receive and process the document, subject to compliance with the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
¶ 703Law Applied
Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908, requires a Sub-Registrar refusing registration—except where the property is outside the sub-district—to record an order of refusal and the reasons in Book No. 2, endorse “registration refused” on the document, and provide a copy of the reasons upon application.
¶ 6A registering authority may refuse registration only by adopting the statutory procedure and by communicating a reasoned decision.
¶ 7The Court also required compliance with the applicable provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
¶ 7Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Registration Act, 1908 Section 71
04Reasoning
Since the petitioner’s grievance was that Respondent No. 2 was refusing to register the document, and the respondents agreed to follow Section 71, the Court directed the registering authority to receive and process the document in accordance with law.
¶ 4–7The direction did not amount to an adjudication that the petitioner was entitled to registration.
¶ 6–7The authority remained entitled to refuse the document if it had a valid objection, but it was required to record reasons and communicate the decision to the petitioner in accordance with Section 71.
¶ 6–705Holding
The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the registering authority to receive and process the petitioner’s document concerning the subject property, subject to compliance with the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
¶ 7The authority was permitted to refuse registration on valid grounds, provided it assigned reasons and communicated its decision to the petitioner.
¶ 7The Court expressly clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits or on the petitioner’s entitlement to registration.
¶ 7Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed, with no order as to costs.
¶ 7Original Court PDF
Smt. Mohammed NazeemavsThe State of Telangana
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
