Facts
The applicant filed a first bail application seeking regular bail following his arrest on September 2, 2025.
Source reference: para. 1, 3The prosecution alleged that on September 1, 2025, the applicant stabbed the complainant’s brother, Dwarika Gupta, in the abdomen with a pair of scissors.
Source reference: para. 2The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the injury occurred during a scuffle initiated by the victim while the applicant was meeting a third party.
Source reference: para. 3A charge sheet has been filed, and charges have been framed, but no prosecution witnesses have been examined to date.
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the injury and the duration of his pretrial detention.
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1The substantive charges were governed by Sections 296 (Obscene acts and songs), 351(2) (Criminal intimidation), and 109 (Punishment of abetment) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Source reference: para. 1The court also referenced the procedural requirements for trial attendance and the consequences of jumping bail under Sections 84 (Proclamation for person absconding), 209 (Non-appearance of accused), and 269 (Attendance of prisoner) of the BNS/BNSS framework.
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court balanced the gravity of the State’s allegations—that the applicant used a weapon to inflict a grievous injury on a sensitive part of the body—against the mitigating factors presented by the defense.
Source reference: para. 4, 6The Court observed that while the injury was grievous and located in the abdomen, it was characterized as being on a "non-vital part of the body".
Source reference: para. 6Furthermore, the Court noted that the applicant has no prior criminal antecedents and has been incarcerated since September 2025.
Source reference: para. 6Given that the investigation is complete, the charge sheet is filed, and the trial is at a stage where witnesses have yet to be examined, the Court determined that continued detention was unnecessary, provided strict conditions were imposed to ensure trial participation.
Source reference: para. 6, 7Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties.
The grant of bail is subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness testimony, must attend all court dates, and must appear for specific trial milestones (framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS).
Source reference: para. 7The Court further directed the Trial Court to endeavor to conclude the trial within six months.
Source reference: para. 8Original Court PDF
Amit Kumar Sahu @ Baba @ Sumit Vishwakarma v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 215 of 2026; 2026:CGHC:10765]
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in