Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail granted as injury with weapon was on non-vital body part without criminal antecedents.

Amit Kumar Sahu @ Baba @ Sumit Vishwakarma v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 215 of 2026; 2026:CGHC:10765]

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: no citation2 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant filed a first bail application seeking regular bail following his arrest on September 2, 2025.

Source reference: para. 1, 3

The prosecution alleged that on September 1, 2025, the applicant stabbed the complainant’s brother, Dwarika Gupta, in the abdomen with a pair of scissors.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the injury occurred during a scuffle initiated by the victim while the applicant was meeting a third party.

Source reference: para. 3

A charge sheet has been filed, and charges have been framed, but no prosecution witnesses have been examined to date.

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the injury and the duration of his pretrial detention.

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

The substantive charges were governed by Sections 296 (Obscene acts and songs), 351(2) (Criminal intimidation), and 109 (Punishment of abetment) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The court also referenced the procedural requirements for trial attendance and the consequences of jumping bail under Sections 84 (Proclamation for person absconding), 209 (Non-appearance of accused), and 269 (Attendance of prisoner) of the BNS/BNSS framework.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court balanced the gravity of the State’s allegations—that the applicant used a weapon to inflict a grievous injury on a sensitive part of the body—against the mitigating factors presented by the defense.

Source reference: para. 4, 6

The Court observed that while the injury was grievous and located in the abdomen, it was characterized as being on a "non-vital part of the body".

Source reference: para. 6

Furthermore, the Court noted that the applicant has no prior criminal antecedents and has been incarcerated since September 2025.

Source reference: para. 6

Given that the investigation is complete, the charge sheet is filed, and the trial is at a stage where witnesses have yet to be examined, the Court determined that continued detention was unnecessary, provided strict conditions were imposed to ensure trial participation.

Source reference: para. 6, 7
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties.

The grant of bail is subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness testimony, must attend all court dates, and must appear for specific trial milestones (framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS).

Source reference: para. 7

The Court further directed the Trial Court to endeavor to conclude the trial within six months.

Source reference: para. 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

Amit Kumar Sahu @ Baba @ Sumit Vishwakarma v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 215 of 2026; 2026:CGHC:10765]

Chhattisgarh High Court · no citation

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment