Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail granted for alleged official impersonation citing lack of antecedents and duration of custody.

TIKESHWAR NARETI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 24, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on February 21, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 66/2026 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtari.

Source reference: para 2

The prosecution alleged that the applicant attempted to evade toll tax at a plaza near Aamatalab Road by affixing a "National Crime Control Organization" logo on his Scorpio vehicle and possessing an identity card designating him as the "Vice President" of said organization to misrepresent himself as an authorized official.

Source reference: para 2

The applicant was charged under Sections 204, 205, and 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Source reference: para 1

The applicant argued he was a bona fide member of a registered NGO, "Ek Naya Savera," and had been misled by a social media advertisement regarding the organization's objectives.

Source reference: para 3
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the allegations and his period of incarceration.

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with discretionary power to grant bail to an accused in custody.

Source reference: para 1

Substantive offences were registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), specifically Sections 204 (personating a public servant), 205 (false personation for the purpose of act or proceeding in suit or prosecution), and 336(3) (related to forgery or fraudulent misrepresentation).

Source reference: para 1
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that the applicant is a 28-year-old individual with no prior criminal antecedents.

Source reference: para 3, 6

Although the State Counsel opposed bail on the grounds that the charge-sheet had not yet been filed, the Court observed that the applicant had already been in judicial custody since February 21, 2026.

Source reference: para 4, 6

The Court reasoned that since the conclusion of the trial would likely take a significant amount of time, and given the specific facts and circumstances of the case—including the lack of previous criminal history—the applicant’s continued detention was not necessary.

Source reference: para 6
05

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the applicant, ordering his release upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties.

The bail is subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness examination, must appear personally at every hearing unless excused (or face proceedings under Section 269 of the BNS), and must be present for the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para 7

Any misuse of liberty or failure to appear after a proclamation under Section 84 of the BNSS will trigger proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS.

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

TIKESHWAR NARETIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment