Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail granted on ground of parity with identically situated co-accused already released from custody.

KULDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The complainant, an employee at SKS Power Plant, was induced via a WhatsApp link to join a share trading group and download the "Samara Pro" application.

Source reference: para 2

Between March 9 and March 27, 2024, the complainant invested Rs. 91,00,000/- based on advice from individuals claiming to be associated with Samara Capital.

Source reference: para 2

Although his portfolio allegedly grew to Rs. 5.26 crore, the accused persons restricted his access and liquidated his holdings after he refused to pay additional sums demanded as "profit difference".

Source reference: para 2

The applicant, Kuldeep Singh, was arrested on May 7, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 412/2024 for alleged cheating and cyber fraud.

Source reference: para 3, 7

Following the completion of the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed.

Source reference: para 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, primarily on the ground of parity with co-accused persons already released.

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.

Source reference: para 1

The substantive charges involve Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for cheating and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act for personation using computer resources.

Source reference: para 1

The court relied on the principle of parity, noting the bail orders for co-accused Ashish Agrawal (granted by the Supreme Court in SLP (Crl.) No. 21040/2025) and Shekhar Thapliyal (granted by the Chhattisgarh High Court in MCRC No. 1929/2026).

Source reference: para 3, 6

Procedural conditions for bail were governed by Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The court observed that while the applicant has one criminal antecedent, the investigation is complete as the charge-sheet has already been filed.

Source reference: para 4, 6

The court emphasized the principle of parity, noting that the State did not dispute that the applicant’s role and situation were identical to those of co-accused Ashish Agrawal and Shekhar Thapliyal, both of whom were granted bail by the Hon'ble Apex Court and the High Court, respectively.

Source reference: para 4, 6

Furthermore, the court considered the applicant's period of incarceration since May 7, 2025, and the likelihood that the trial would consume significant time, concluding that continued detention was unnecessary.

Source reference: para 3, 6
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the bail application on the ground of parity.

The Court ordered the release of Kuldeep Singh upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties.

Source reference: para 7

The bail is subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness testimony, must attend all trial dates (subject to Section 269 BNSS for non-appearance), and must remain present for critical trial stages such as framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS.

Source reference: para 7

Failure to comply or absconding will trigger proceedings under Sections 84 and 209 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

KULDEEP SINGHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment