Facts
The applicant, Ajay Goswami, was arrested on 24.11.2025 in connection with Crime No. 423/2025 registered at Police Station Sakti
Source reference: para. 3The prosecution alleged that on 22.11.2025, five unidentified individuals entered the complainant's house at approximately 11:30 PM, demanding ₹30,000 by threatening the complainant regarding illegal liquor sales
Source reference: para. 2The applicant was subsequently arrested based on a memorandum statement
Source reference: para. 2The applicant filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, following the filing of the charge sheet
Source reference: para. 1, 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, given the nature of the allegations and the procedural status of the case
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant regular bail
Source reference: para. 1The applicant was charged under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 308(2), 319(2), 318(4), 331(4), 204, 205, 112, 351(2), and 3(5)
Source reference: para. 1The court also referenced procedural mandates under BNSS Sections 269 (attendance), 84 (proclamation), and 351 (recording of statement), and BNS Section 209 (non-appearance) as part of the conditions for bail
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court examined the applicant's contention that he was falsely implicated based solely on a memorandum statement of a co-accused, with no incriminating material seized from his possession and no evidence of money being received
Source reference: para. 3The State Counsel confirmed that while the investigation was complete and the charge sheet filed, the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents
Source reference: para. 4The Court reasoned that since the applicant had been detained since 24.11.2025, the investigation was concluded, and the trial was expected to take considerable time, the applicant met the threshold for release
Source reference: para. 6The Court balanced the nature of the allegations against the applicant's clean record and the duration of his pretrial detention to justify the grant of liberty
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties
The holding was subject to strict conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present [para. 7(i)], must appear on all trial dates [para. 7(ii)], and must be present in person for the opening of the case, framing of charges, and recording of statements under Section 351 of BNSS [para. 7(iv)]. Failure to comply with these conditions or appearance proclamations would allow the trial court to initiate proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS
Source reference: para. 7(iii)Original Court PDF
AJAY GOSWAMIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in