Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail granted under BNSS citing charge sheet filing and absence of criminal antecedents.

AJAY GOSWAMI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 17, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Ajay Goswami, was arrested on 24.11.2025 in connection with Crime No. 423/2025 registered at Police Station Sakti

Source reference: para. 3

The prosecution alleged that on 22.11.2025, five unidentified individuals entered the complainant's house at approximately 11:30 PM, demanding ₹30,000 by threatening the complainant regarding illegal liquor sales

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was subsequently arrested based on a memorandum statement

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, following the filing of the charge sheet

Source reference: para. 1, 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, given the nature of the allegations and the procedural status of the case

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant regular bail

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant was charged under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 308(2), 319(2), 318(4), 331(4), 204, 205, 112, 351(2), and 3(5)

Source reference: para. 1

The court also referenced procedural mandates under BNSS Sections 269 (attendance), 84 (proclamation), and 351 (recording of statement), and BNS Section 209 (non-appearance) as part of the conditions for bail

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court examined the applicant's contention that he was falsely implicated based solely on a memorandum statement of a co-accused, with no incriminating material seized from his possession and no evidence of money being received

Source reference: para. 3

The State Counsel confirmed that while the investigation was complete and the charge sheet filed, the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents

Source reference: para. 4

The Court reasoned that since the applicant had been detained since 24.11.2025, the investigation was concluded, and the trial was expected to take considerable time, the applicant met the threshold for release

Source reference: para. 6

The Court balanced the nature of the allegations against the applicant's clean record and the duration of his pretrial detention to justify the grant of liberty

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties

The holding was subject to strict conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present [para. 7(i)], must appear on all trial dates [para. 7(ii)], and must be present in person for the opening of the case, framing of charges, and recording of statements under Section 351 of BNSS [para. 7(iv)]. Failure to comply with these conditions or appearance proclamations would allow the trial court to initiate proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS

Source reference: para. 7(iii)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

AJAY GOSWAMIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 17, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment