Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail granted under Excise Act considering prolonged judicial custody and filing of charge-sheet.

SUNIL KUMAR MAHTO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 24, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The police, acting on an informant's tip during patrolling, seized 9 bulk litres of country-made liquor from an open area

Source reference: para 2

The applicant was arrested in connection with Crime No. 244/2025 at Police Station Kumhari for illegal possession under the Excise Act

Source reference: para 1-2

The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, no incriminating articles were recovered from his direct possession, and the recovery from an open place failed to establish "conscious possession"

Source reference: para 3

The applicant remained in judicial custody from December 13, 2025

Source reference: para 3

The State opposed the bail application, noting the applicant had two previous criminal antecedents

Source reference: para 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the period of detention and the filing of the charge-sheet

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The court applied Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with the power to grant regular bail

Source reference: para 1

The substantive charge involved Section 34(2) of the Excise Act

Source reference: para 1

Furthermore, the court integrated procedural safeguards and conditions for the trial’s integrity under Sections 84 (proclamation for person absconding), 209 (failure to appear in court), 269 (non-attendance of person in custody/bail), and 351 (recording of statement of accused) of the BNSS

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The court balanced the nature and gravity of the offence against the applicant’s period of detention.

Source reference: para 6

It noted that the applicant had been in judicial custody for over three months (since December 13, 2025).

Source reference: para 6

Crucially, the court observed that the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet had already been filed before the competent court

Source reference: para 6

Despite the State’s objection regarding the applicant's criminal history, the court found that the conclusion of the trial would likely take considerable time

Source reference: para 4, 6

By evaluating the circumstances of the seizure—specifically the recovery from an open place and the lack of established conscious possession at the prima facie stage—the court determined that continued incarceration was not warranted

Source reference: para 3, 6
05

Holding

The court answered the issue in the affirmative and granted regular bail

The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties

Source reference: para 7

The bail is subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during evidence, must appear on every trial date (subject to Section 269 BNSS), and must be present for the framing of charges and the recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS

Source reference: para 7

Any violation of these terms allows the trial court to treat the default as an abuse of liberty and proceed under Sections 84 and 209 of the BNSS

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SUNIL KUMAR MAHTOvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment