Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail may be granted in excise offenses where the accused has no criminal antecedents and the charge-sheet is filed.

SAKIRTAN YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 27, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on 28.01.2026 in connection with Crime No. 23/2026 for allegedly transporting 45 bulk liters of handmade Kachchi Mahua liquor on a motorcycle

Source reference: para 2

The police registered an FIR under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act after seizing the liquor

Source reference: para 2

The applicant filed this first bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, contending false implication, lack of exclusive possession, and absence of prior criminal antecedents

Source reference: para 1, 3

The charge-sheet has already been filed, and the applicant has been in judicial custody since 28.01.2026

Source reference: para 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail considering the nature of the offense, his criminal history, and the stage of the trial.

Source reference: para 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the power of the High Court to grant bail

Source reference: para 1

Sections 34(2) and 59(A) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which prescribe a punishment ranging from one to three years for the unlawful transport of liquor

Source reference: para 1, 3

Procedural safeguards under Sections 209, 269, 84, and 351 of the BNSS to ensure the applicant’s presence during trial while on bail

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The Court evaluated the gravity of the allegations alongside the applicant's conduct and procedural status. It noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, meaning custodial interrogation was no longer required

Source reference: para 6

Crucially, the Court observed that the applicant had no previous criminal antecedents, a fact endorsed by the State’s counsel

Source reference: para 4, 6

Given the prescribed punishment for the offense (1–3 years) and the likelihood that the trial would consume a considerable amount of time, the Court reasoned that continued incarceration was unnecessary

Source reference: para 3, 6

The Court balanced the liberty of the individual with the integrity of the judicial process by imposing strict conditions, such as prohibiting adjournments when witnesses are present and requiring personal appearances at key trial stages

Source reference: para 7
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and allowed the bail application

The applicant was ordered to be released on regular bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties

Source reference: para 7

The holding is contingent upon several conditions, including that the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments [para 7(i)], must appear on every date fixed by the trial court [para 7(ii)], and must be present personally for the framing of charges and recording of statements [para 7(iv)]. Any violation of these conditions allows the trial court to initiate proceedings for abuse of liberty or under Section 209 of the BNS

Source reference: para 7(iii)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SAKIRTAN YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment