CAT - ['Srinagar']

Respondents Directed to Treat Original Application as Representation for Grant of In-Situ Promotions and Retiral Benefits

Mohammad Ahsan WanI vs SOCIAL WELFARE

CAT - ['Srinagar']JUDGMENT: May 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a 70-year-old retired employee, claims entitlement to 1st and 2nd in-situ promotions effective from 02.02.1996 and 02.02.2005, respectively, under the J&K Civil Services (Higher Standard Pay Scale Scheme) Rules, 1996.

Source reference: para. 01–02

He alleges that the respondents have failed to grant these promotions and have withheld his retiral benefits, including leave salary and gratuity, causing him grave pecuniary hardship.

Source reference: para. 02

During the proceedings, the applicant’s counsel requested that the Original Application (OA) be treated as a representation for time-bound consideration by the respondents.

Source reference: para. 04
02

Issues

1. Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the applicant’s claims for in-situ promotions and retiral benefits in a time-bound manner.

Source reference: para. 04, 06
03

Law Applied

Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Higher Standard Pay Scale Scheme) Rules, 1996 (notified via SRO 14 dated 15.01.1996), which mandate the grant of in-situ promotions to eligible employees.

Source reference: para. 01

Principles of administrative justice, allowing for the disposal of a service matter by directing the competent authority to treat the litigation as a formal representation for administrative review.

Source reference: para. 06
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal did not adjudicate the merits of the applicant’s eligibility for the promotions. Instead, it focused on the procedural remedy requested by the applicant’s counsel.

Source reference: para. 06

Given the limited prayer to have the OA treated as a representation, and the lack of objection from the respondents’ counsel (including the Principal Accountant General and AAG), the Tribunal determined that the interests of justice would be served by directing the respondents to evaluate the applicant's claims under the existing statutory framework.

Source reference: para. 05–06

The Tribunal emphasized that such consideration must be based on the applicant’s eligibility and the absence of legal impediments.

Source reference: para. 06
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the OA without expressing an opinion on the merits.

It directed the respondents to treat the OA as a representation and pass a detailed, reasoned, and speaking order regarding the applicant’s in-situ promotions and retiral benefits within eight weeks from the receipt of the certified order.

Source reference: para. 06–07

All connected miscellaneous applications were also disposed of with no order as to costs.

Source reference: para. 08
CAT - ['Srinagar']

Original Court PDF

Mohammad Ahsan WanIvsSOCIAL WELFARE

CAT - ['Srinagar'] · May 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment