Facts
The petitioner challenged an adjudication order dated 1 December 2023 under Section 73 of the CGST/KGST Acts, concerning input tax credit (ITC) for July 2017 to March 2018.
Source reference: p. 4–6The petitioner had filed the corresponding returns between April and August 2019, after the original due dates but before 30 November 2021.
Source reference: p. 4–6The petitioner relied on the retrospective insertion of Section 16(5), effective from 1 July 2017, which addresses ITC for specified earlier tax periods where returns were filed by 30 November 2021.
Source reference: p. 6The Court considered the challenge to the adjudication order and the applicability of that amendment.
Source reference: p. 4–7Issues
1. Whether the petitioner’s delayed filing of returns defeated its claim to ITC for the relevant period, notwithstanding the retrospective insertion of Section 16(5).
Source reference: p. 5–72. Whether the adjudication order should be set aside and the matter reconsidered in light of Section 16(5).
Source reference: p. 7Law Applied
Section 16(5) of the CGST/KGST Acts, retrospectively effective from 1 July 2017, permits a registered taxable person to claim ITC for the specified tax periods, including 2017–18, where the relevant return is filed up to 30 November 2021.
Source reference: p. 6The adjudication was made under Section 73(9) of the Acts.
Source reference: p. 4Reasoning
The petitioner’s returns related to the tax period covered by Section 16(5) and had been filed before 30 November 2021.
Source reference: p. 5–7The Court therefore considered the petitioner entitled to ITC in light of the retrospective amendment and concluded that the adjudicating authority should reconsider the matter and issue a formal order applying that provision.
Source reference: p. 7Holding
The petition was allowed, and the adjudication order dated 1 December 2023 was quashed.
The proceedings were restored to the first respondent to pass a formal order in light of the Court’s observation that the petitioner was entitled to ITC under retrospectively inserted Section 16(5).
Source reference: p. 7The petitioner was permitted to submit a certified copy of the judgment; the first respondent was directed to communicate the order by 30 November 2026, following the timeline stated in the judgment.
Source reference: p. 7–8Acts & Sections Cited
6 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20173
KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 20173
Original Court PDF
M/S SHIVNEEL GAS SALESvsTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
