CAT - Delhi

Right to interest on delayed retiral dues affirmed despite financial constraints.

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal v. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi [O.A. No. 602/2026]

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: 18 February 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal, retired on December 31, 2023

Source reference: para. 2, 4

He received his leave encashment on October 29, 2024, death-cum-retirement gratuity on February 25, 2025, and October 24, 2025, and GPF on March 19, 2025

Source reference: para. 4.2, p. 2

The applicant filed the present O.A. seeking payment of interest on delayed retiral dues, release of pending arrears of Dearness Allowance (DA) for 2018-19 and January 2021 to December 2021, Bonus for 2014-15, 2019-20, and 2020-21, and MACP arrears along with 12% p.a. interest

Source reference: para. 1, p. 2

The respondent admitted the applicant's entitlement to all retirement benefits, citing financial constraints as the reason for delayed payment

Source reference: para. 8

The Tribunal noted that numerous similar OAs had been filed by ex-employees due to delayed benefits, and that the MCD's recent budget of Rs. 17,000 Crores suggested it could allocate funds for such payments

Source reference: para. 10
02

Issues

Whether the respondent should be directed to pay interest on the delayed payment of retiral dues to the applicant

Source reference: para. 1, p. 2

Whether the respondent should be directed to release the pending arrears of Dearness Allowance, Bonus, and MACP arrears to the applicant

Source reference: para. 1, p. 2
03

Law Applied

The court relied on the established legal principle that employees are entitled to receive interest for delayed payment of retirement benefits, citing the Full Bench judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 2821/2023 titled Rajbir Singh Vs. MCD and Anr. dated October 30, 2025

Source reference: para. 11(2)
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the applicant's retiral benefits were significantly delayed, with payments stretching into 2024 and 2025 despite his retirement in December 2023

Source reference: para. 4.2, p. 2; para. 4

The respondent admitted the applicant's entitlement to all benefits, attributing the delay solely to financial constraints

Source reference: para. 8

However, the Tribunal rejected this explanation, noting it was frequently used by the MCD and that the recent Rs. 17,000 Crore budget demonstrated the MCD's capacity to allocate adequate funds

Source reference: para. 10

Relying on the precedent set by the Full Bench judgment in Rajbir Singh (supra), the Tribunal concluded that such delays warrant the payment of interest

Source reference: para. 10, 11(2)
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the O.A. at the admission stage

It directed the respondent to release the pending dues, including DA allowances, MACP arrears, and Bonus, within eight weeks from the receipt of the order

Source reference: para. 11(1)

Additionally, the respondent was ordered to pay interest on the delayed payments at applicable GPF rates, as per the Full Bench judgment in Rajbir Singh (supra), within the same eight-week period

Source reference: para. 11(2)

These exercises are subject to the outcome of Writ Petition No. 19558/2025, filed by the respondents before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi against the Rajbir Singh order

Source reference: para. 12
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal v. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi [O.A. No. 602/2026]

CAT - Delhi · 18 February 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment