Facts
The petitioners, residents of Village Dodkachowra, were granted Patta for Abadi land in 2001 and have been conducting business there
Source reference: para. 2Disputes arose with Respondents Nos. 6-8 (private individuals) regarding land encroachment, leading to revenue proceedings where the Tehsildar Jashpur passed orders in favor of the petitioners on 08.01.2020 and 12.06.2020
Source reference: para. 2Respondent No. 2 (Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Tribes Commission) issued a notice dated 05.11.2020 (Annexure P/1) to the petitioners... based on a complaint (Annexure P/2) alleging that the petitioners had illegally occupied government land
Source reference: para. 1, 2, 3The petitioners challenged this notice via a Writ Petition, arguing it constituted "double jeopardy" as the Tehsildar was already seized of the matter
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the notice issued by the Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Tribes Commission is maintainable and requires the petitioners to submit to its jurisdiction despite pending revenue proceedings.
Source reference: para. 4, 6Law Applied
The Court applied the principles of administrative law regarding the exhaustion of alternative remedies and the procedural powers of statutory commissions.
Source reference: para. 5It recognized the authority of the State Scheduled Tribes Commission to investigate complaints and issue notices to parties to present their defense.
Source reference: para. 5the court relied on the principle of Audi Alteram Partem, ensuring that the petitioners are granted a fair opportunity of hearing and the right to produce evidence before a statutory body prior to any adverse order being passed
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Court observed that the Commission had issued a notice based on a formal complaint and that the petitioners had approached the High Court prematurely instead of responding to the statutory body
Source reference: para. 5The Court reasoned that the appropriate course of action was for the petitioners to file a detailed reply and submit relevant documents (including the Tehsildar’s reports) to the Commission
Source reference: para. 6By directing the Commission to consider "each and every aspect of the matter" and pass a reasoned order on merits, the Court ensured that the prior revenue findings would be brought to the Commission's attention through proper procedural channels
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The High Court disposed of the Writ Petition without interfering with the impugned notice.
It directed the petitioners to appear before the Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Tribes Commission and file a detailed reply with supporting documents. The Commission was ordered to decide the case on its merits within 60 days from the date of production of the court order, ensuring a due opportunity of hearing.
Source reference: para. 6the Court granted interim relief by directing that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners until the Commission concludes its proceedings
Source reference: para. 7-8Original Court PDF
DASHRATH PRASAD JAISWALvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in