Chhattisgarh High Court

Section 37 NDPS Act rigors inapplicable to intermediate quantity of contraband; regular bail granted.

BAHADUR SINGH RATHORE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicants were arrested on January 15, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 19/2026 at Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur, for the alleged possession of 11.08 Kgs of Ganja

Source reference: para. 1, 3

The prosecution alleged that the seizure was made based on secret information

Source reference: para. 2

The applicants were charged under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act)

Source reference: para. 1

The applicants moved the High Court for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, noting that the charge-sheet had already been filed and they had no prior criminal antecedents

Source reference: para. 1, 3, 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS considering the quantity of contraband seized and the duration of their incarceration.

Source reference: para. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail

Source reference: para. 1

It further examined Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985, in conjunction with Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which mandates strict conditions for bail in cases involving "commercial quantities" of narcotics

Source reference: para. 3

The Court noted that for Ganja, the commercial quantity is defined as more than 20 Kgs; quantities below this threshold but above "small quantity" are categorized as "intermediate," thereby not attracting the mandatory rigors of Section 37

Source reference: para. 3, 6
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the total quantity of Ganja seized from the joint possession of the applicants was 11.08 Kgs, which falls within the intermediate category and is significantly below the 20 Kg commercial threshold

Source reference: para. 3, 6

Consequently, the stringent limitations on bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were found inapplicable

Source reference: para. 3

The Court took judicial notice of the fact that the applicants had no previous criminal record and that the charge-sheet had already been submitted to the trial court

Source reference: para. 3, 4

Given that the applicants had been in custody since January 15, 2026, and the trial was expected to consume considerable time, the Court determined that continued pretrial detention was not warranted

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicants on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each

The holding clarified that in cases of intermediate quantity under the NDPS Act where no criminal antecedents exist and the investigation is complete, bail may be granted subject to conditions

Source reference: para. 6

The Court imposed several conditions, including a prohibition on seeking unnecessary adjournments, mandatory personal appearance during key trial stages, and warnings regarding proceedings under Sections 209 and 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for non-compliance or absconsion

Source reference: para. 7(i), 7(iv), 7(ii), (iii)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

BAHADUR SINGH RATHOREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment